2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02214-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute pancreatitis: an update on the revised Atlanta classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Organ failure and local or systemic complications are used for this type of classification. [7][8][9] In our study, all patients with mortality were in the severe RAC group. As mentioned earlier, one of the severity scoring systems is the BISAP score, which can detect patients at risk of death or severe illness early in the AP course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organ failure and local or systemic complications are used for this type of classification. [7][8][9] In our study, all patients with mortality were in the severe RAC group. As mentioned earlier, one of the severity scoring systems is the BISAP score, which can detect patients at risk of death or severe illness early in the AP course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[3][4][5][6] Revised Atlanta classification (RAC) is another clinical and radiological classification to estimate the severity of AP that organ failure and local or systemic complications are used for this type of classification. [7][8][9] Metabolic syndrome (MetS) as a common problem is the combination of metabolic abnormalities including central obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and hypertension. MetS is associated with increased mortality and morbidity but lifestyle modifications and some medication can reverse metabolic risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hospital automation system was used to screen patient records according to the ICD-10 (K85) diagnosis code. Patients over 18 years of age, who did not have any trauma, who were not pregnant, who had no hematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with Acute Pancreatitis according to the Revised Atlanta Criteria, and who had sufficient data in their records were included in the study [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el presente estudio definimos pertinencia de la indicación de la TAC abdominal si el paciente contaba con ultrasonografía abdominal positiva y cumplía con los criterios de diagnóstico de Atlanta (15) , los cuales son historia clínica del paciente bien documentado sobre dolor abdominal o de espalda, un nivel de amilasa o lipasa superior a 3 veces el límite superior de lo normal, indicación de la TAC luego de las 48 horas y que aclaró y/o confirmó el diagnóstico y tuvo impacto en su tratamiento.…”
Section: Definiciones Y Medicionesunclassified