2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute nosocomial HCV infection detected by NAT of a regular blood donor

Abstract: The introduction of routine screening of blood donors by HCV NAT was directly responsible for the early detection and investigation of an unusual case of HCV infection involving a regular donor. Genomic sequencing studies provided firm evidence of patient-to-patient transmission of HCV in an IV clinic. The report clearly demonstrates the value of molecular fingerprinting in tracking nosocomial HCV infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the donor who had an occupationally acquired infection did not recognize that an exposure had taken place, and the donor with a sexual partner who was engaged in IDU was not aware of this behavior until after his NAT‐positive donation. The single HCV NAT‐positive, anti‐HCV‐seronegative donor reported from Canada was determined to be infected by contamination of a reused IV antibiotic delivery system 22 . Overall, we may have reached the maximum efficiency of the donor history questions, and NAT will continue to be an important measure to interdict recently infected blood donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the donor who had an occupationally acquired infection did not recognize that an exposure had taken place, and the donor with a sexual partner who was engaged in IDU was not aware of this behavior until after his NAT‐positive donation. The single HCV NAT‐positive, anti‐HCV‐seronegative donor reported from Canada was determined to be infected by contamination of a reused IV antibiotic delivery system 22 . Overall, we may have reached the maximum efficiency of the donor history questions, and NAT will continue to be an important measure to interdict recently infected blood donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of HCV‐positive donors had at least one of the six risk factors in the model, there were some donors who did not admit to any of these. These donors could have had exposure to rare or less specific risk factors such as nosocomial infections, 22 the effect of which some studies have attempted to tease out 19,23 . Such risk factors, however, are not necessarily causal; may vary in different jurisdictions depending on, for example, infectious disease control policies; and are not sufficiently specific to be applied as donor exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCV positive sample 6048 (genotype 1b) and sample 6005 (genotype 2a) were used for the amplification of the full‐length NS5A gene. In each case, virus positive plasma samples were collected before IFN therapy and the viral load was assessed prior to as well as following IFN therapy using the COBAS Amplicor HCV MonitorTest, v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) [Larke et al, 2002].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%