1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03238-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute neuropsychiatric findings in a patient receiving fentanyl for cancer pain

Abstract: A 62-year-old man receiving subcutaneous fentanyl for the management of cancer pain developed generalized central excitation after an overdose of 5000 micrograms of fentanyl. The patient developed acute confusion, restlessness, generalized myoclonus, visual hallucinations, and hyperalgesia and tremors upon tactile stimulation of the arms or legs. These symptoms rapidly disappeared after the administration of 0.2 mg of naloxone. Within an hour the symptoms reappeared and once again, responded immediately after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fisher [7,8] described two cases of visual hallucinations on eye closure attributed to atropine toxicity and lidocaine as the local anesthetic for minor surgery. In our patient, hydrocortisone, fentanyl, ephedrine, and midazolam, along with atropine and lidocaine could be candidate hallucinogens [9][10][11][12], although the doses were not excessive. Microembolic insult to the pulmonary circulation resulting in cerebral hypoxic damage and/or direct damage to the visual association cortex may cause visual hallucinations on eye closure [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Fisher [7,8] described two cases of visual hallucinations on eye closure attributed to atropine toxicity and lidocaine as the local anesthetic for minor surgery. In our patient, hydrocortisone, fentanyl, ephedrine, and midazolam, along with atropine and lidocaine could be candidate hallucinogens [9][10][11][12], although the doses were not excessive. Microembolic insult to the pulmonary circulation resulting in cerebral hypoxic damage and/or direct damage to the visual association cortex may cause visual hallucinations on eye closure [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The rationale of switching opioid (opioid rotation) in the context of opioid-related delirium is that the potentially toxic metabolites from the prior opioid are eliminated when a switch is made to a new opioid [28,72]. However, opioid-induced delirium is not exclusively due to metabolite accumulation: cases of opioid toxicity have been reported in relation to fentanyl and methadone, neither of which is known to have active metabolites [12,104]. Hence, the potential accumulation of parent opioid or possibly unknown metabolites also needs to be considered in the pathogenesis of opioid-related delirium.…”
Section: Fluid Deficit State: Pathophysiology and Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solche auch unter eskalierenden Dosen von transdermalem Fentanyl auftretenden pronozizeptiven Effekte [9] scheinen beim Opioid Buprenorphin, selbst wenn es wie im vorliegenden Fall in extrem hohen Dosierungen eingesetzt wird, nicht vorzuliegen. Eine solche Annahme kann aus experimentell am Menschen gewonnenen Daten abgeleitet werden, denn ein hyperalgetischer Effekt, wie er bei wachen Probanden für Fentanyl und Alfentanil typisch ist, konnte bei Buprenorphin nicht nachgewiesen werden [26].…”
Section: Pronozizeptive Effekteunclassified