2003
DOI: 10.1080/1042819031000116698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia with t(8;21)—Identification of a Specific Immunophenotype

Abstract: Association between certain surface markers and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) has been described. The specificity and the predictive values of these markers have never been assessed. In this study, we aimed, to explore whether a specific pattern could predict for this translocation. Of 405 consecutive AML, 18 (4.4%) had the t(8;21). Patients with this cytogenetic abnormality showed higher frequency of CD34 (P = 0.003), HLA-DR (P = 0.03), Tdt (P = 0.02), CD19 (P < 0.0001), and CD56 (P < 0.0001) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13] We have shown that combined CD34, CD19 and CD56 positivity in AML patients has a 67% sensitivity, 100% specificity and a positive predictive value of 100% for the presence of t(8;21). 14 Despite support for the existence of a unique immunophenotype in AML with t(8;21), quantitative immunophenotyping in this form of AML has rarely been reported. 13 Recent reports have suggested that quantitative immunophenotyping may enhance the diagnosis of leukemias with specific cytogenetic abnormalities [15][16][17] and help define aberrant immunophenotyping patterns that could be useful for monitoring minimal residual disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] We have shown that combined CD34, CD19 and CD56 positivity in AML patients has a 67% sensitivity, 100% specificity and a positive predictive value of 100% for the presence of t(8;21). 14 Despite support for the existence of a unique immunophenotype in AML with t(8;21), quantitative immunophenotyping in this form of AML has rarely been reported. 13 Recent reports have suggested that quantitative immunophenotyping may enhance the diagnosis of leukemias with specific cytogenetic abnormalities [15][16][17] and help define aberrant immunophenotyping patterns that could be useful for monitoring minimal residual disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AML, characteristic antigens have been related to particular morphological FAB subtypes and associated with the presence of recurrent genetic abnormalities (Bagg, 2007), such as AML-M2 with t(8;21) that shows aberrant expression of lymphoid markers include CD19 and CD56 (Khoury et al, 2003), another one is coexpression of CD2 in M4E with inv(16) or t(16; 16), although not specific for this type of AML (Dunphy, 1999;Medeiros et al, 2010) and M5 with t(9;11) is reported to have high expression CD56 (Graf et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2005). Regarding ALL, t (9; 22) was reported to be more frequently observed in My+B ALL than in My-B ALL (Wu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all reported AML patients with t(7;21)(p22;q22) including our current case, the common features in these patients include: 1) Aberrant CD56 expression (8/9 patients) and aberrant CD7 expression (6/9 patients). No patients had expression of CD19, which is commonly seen in t(8;21) [13,14]. 2) Myelomonocytic or monocytic differentiation was common (6/9), and 3/9 patients did not show maturation or showed minimal differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%