Acute maternal social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress after ultrasonographic detection of a fetal structural anomaly

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Kaasen A, Helbig A, Malt U, Næs T, Skari H, Haugen G. Acute maternal social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress after ultrasonographic detection of a fetal structural anomaly. BJOG 2010;117:1127–1138. Objectives To predict acute psychological distress in pregnant women following detection of a fetal structural anomaly by ultrasonography, and to relate these findings to a comparison group. Design A prospective, observational study. Setting Tertiary referral centre for fetal medicine. Population One hundred and eighty pregnant women with a fetal structural anomaly detected by ultrasound (study group) and 111 with normal ultrasound findings (comparison group) were included within a week following sonographic examination after gestational age 12 weeks (inclusion period: May 2006 to February 2009). Methods Social dysfunction and health perception were assessed by the corresponding subscales of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ‐28). Psychological distress was assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (IES‐22), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the anxiety and depression subscales of the GHQ‐28. Fetal anomalies were classified according to severity and diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity at the time of assessment. Main outcome measures Social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress (intrusion, avoidance, arousal, anxiety, depression). Results The least severe anomalies with no diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity induced the lowest levels of IES intrusive distress (P = 0.025). Women included after 22 weeks of gestation (24%) reported significantly higher GHQ distress than women included earlier in pregnancy (P = 0.003). The study group had significantly higher levels of psychosocial distress than the comparison group on all psychometric endpoints. Conclusions Psychological distress was predicted by gestational age at the time of assessment, severity of the fetal anomaly, and ambiguity concerning diagnosis or prognosis.

Psychological correlates of decision-making during prenatal diagnosis: a prospective study

“…Additionally, it has been shown that prenatal diagnostic procedure can have a negative emotional impact on pregnant women [27][28][29]. The detection of a fetal anomaly generally determined an increase in psychosocial distress in both parents, and especially in women [30]. This is in line with our results: women carrying a fetus with an anomaly experienced higher anxiety and depression compared with women with a normal child.…”

"Wrapping myself in cotton wool": Australian women's experience of being diagnosed with vasa praevia

“…For example, a prospective study of women who had prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomaly by ultrasound reported that ambiguity regarding diagnosis [34], as well as uncertainty about prenatal outcome of the fetus to be associated with high psychological distress [35]. Another study showed that false positive soft markers in prenatal ultrasound screening provoked maternal anxiety during pregnancy [36] and reduced early mother-infant interaction at 2 months after giving birth, although the infant was normal.…”

Prenatal ultrasound screening: False positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction

“…High levels of anxiety and psychological distress have been documented in pregnant women for whom a foetal malformation is suspected [5][6][7][8], diagnosed [8,9], or when prenatal diagnosis appears ambiguous [9]. The finding of a SM is also associated with psychological distress and anxiety [10].…”