2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf03166920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute forearm compartment syndrome: Report of three cases and a review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is controversy whether an invasive pressure measurement should be performed on a routine basis [31] to establish the diagnosis. Ortiz and Berger [23] and Sparkes et al [32] suggest that the diagnosis of forearm compartment syndrome can be solely based on clinical findings, particularly with pain on passive stretch [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is controversy whether an invasive pressure measurement should be performed on a routine basis [31] to establish the diagnosis. Ortiz and Berger [23] and Sparkes et al [32] suggest that the diagnosis of forearm compartment syndrome can be solely based on clinical findings, particularly with pain on passive stretch [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four articles identified blunt trauma in 44 patients as the most prevalent cause of soft tissue trauma-related ACS, leading up to 20.9% of soft tissue-injured patients [ 57 , 82 , 85 , 86 ]. Three identified 39 patients with burns (18.6%) [ 61 , 76 , 85 ], and six reported 36 patients with ACS (17.1%) that occurred after crush injury [ 65 , 73 , 74 , 80 , 85 , 86 ]. Two did not specify the extent of the trauma, reporting generic soft tissue injuries in 37 patients as the cause of ACS (Table 2 ) [ 51 , 53 ].…”
Section: Soft Tissue Injury-related Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%