2021
DOI: 10.2147/jir.s337549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Exposure to the Food-Borne Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes Does Not Induce α-Synuclein Pathology in the Colonic ENS of Nonhuman Primates

Abstract: Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) inflammation elicited by environmental factors is proposed to trigger Parkinson's disease (PD) by stimulating accumulation of pathological αsynuclein (α-syn) in the enteric nervous system (ENS), which then propagates to the central nervous system via the vagus nerve. The goal of this study was to model, in nonhuman primates, an acute exposure to a common food-borne pathogen in order to assess whether the related acute GI inflammation could initiate persistent α-syn pathology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It discusses the difference between ‘negative’ or ‘unexpected’ data and ‘useless’ data, re-evaluate the importance of the experimental design to generate valuable data and proposes strategies to work with and report negative results. The suggestions are based on my long-term experience successfully publishing negative results (e.g., ( Emborg and Colombo, 1994 ; Emborg et al, 2001 ; Mancinelli et al, 2021 ; Ohshima-Hosoyama et al, 2012 ). Overall, this paper aims to reframe the perception of working with, reporting and reviewing unexpected data as an opportunity to provide rationale for innovative ideas, prevent the misuse of limited resources and, ultimately, strengthen the reputation of a scientist.…”
Section: Progress In Translational Research Depends On Sharing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It discusses the difference between ‘negative’ or ‘unexpected’ data and ‘useless’ data, re-evaluate the importance of the experimental design to generate valuable data and proposes strategies to work with and report negative results. The suggestions are based on my long-term experience successfully publishing negative results (e.g., ( Emborg and Colombo, 1994 ; Emborg et al, 2001 ; Mancinelli et al, 2021 ; Ohshima-Hosoyama et al, 2012 ). Overall, this paper aims to reframe the perception of working with, reporting and reviewing unexpected data as an opportunity to provide rationale for innovative ideas, prevent the misuse of limited resources and, ultimately, strengthen the reputation of a scientist.…”
Section: Progress In Translational Research Depends On Sharing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%