Acute Exercise-Induced Set Shifting Benefits in Healthy Adults and Its Moderators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Positive effects of acute exercise on cognitive performances in general inspired research that investigated the effects of acute exercise on specific cognitive subdomains. Many existing studies examined beneficial effects of acute exercise on subsequent set shifting performance in healthy adults. Set shifting, a subdomain of executive function, is the ability to switch between different cognitive sets. The results of existing studies are inconsistent. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted that pooled available effect sizes. Additionally, moderator analyses were carried out to identify covariates that determine the magnitude of exercise-induced set shifting benefits.Methods: Medline, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were searched for eligible studies. Hedges' g corrected standardized mean difference values were used for analyses. Random-effects weights were applied to pool effects. Potential moderation of the effect of acute exercise on subsequent set shifting performance by exercise intensity, type of exercise, participants' age, and type of control group were examined.Results: Twenty-two studies (N = 1,900) were included into analysis. All aggregated effect sizes ranged from small to moderate. Overall, a small significant beneficial effect was revealed (g = −0.32, 95 % CI −0.45 to −0.18). Heterogeneity of included effect sizes was moderate and significant (T2 = 0.0715, I2 = 46.4%, (p < 0.0016). Moderator analyses revealed a larger average effect in older adults than for studies examining younger adults (−0.42 vs. −0.29). Light exercise (−0.51) led to larger effects than moderate (−0.24) or vigorous exercise (−0.29). Studies testing acute exercise against active control groups showed a noticeably smaller average effect (−0.13) than studies that used passive (−0.38) or cognitive engaging control groups (−0.34). Interestingly, application of resistance or aerobic exercise led to no different average effect sizes (−0.30 vs. −0.32). However, none of the tested covariates reached statistical significance.Conclusion: Acute exercise improves subsequent set shifting performance. However, effect sizes are small, making the relevance for everyday life questionable. The results indicate that older adults benefit more from acute exercise than younger adults do. Light intensity exercise seems most effective while the type of exercise does not seem to influence the magnitude of effects. Research designs with active control groups show the smallest average effect, raising concerns about placebo effects.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019138799

Exercise restores brain insulin sensitivity in sedentary adults who are overweight and obese

“…This appears to result in clinically relevant improvements, as the restored insulin-dependent FC was linked to better cognitive function after the exercise intervention. This is well in line with a recent metaanalysis that underlined aerobic exercise’s effects in improving cognitive flexibility ( 59 ).…”

“…After the second fMRI measurement, cognitive function was evaluated by the trail making test (TMT). This measure of cognitive flexibility has been shown to improve in response to aerobic exercise ( 59 ).…”

Effects of Acute Resistance Exercise on Executive Function: A Systematic Review of the Moderating Role of Intensity and Executive Function Domain

“…A growing body of research has demonstrated a beneficial effect of acute exercise on cognition, particularly for tasks or task components with larger executive function (EF) demands [1][2][3][4][5]. Broadly defined, EF refers to a family of cognitive processes that enable the volitional control of thoughts, emotions, attention, and behaviors to complete task-oriented goals [6,7].…”

“…They are also a key determinant of successful aging [9] and efficiency of daily living, an indispensable part of everyday life [10,11] Accordingly, sustaining and improving EF has become an important public health issue. Critically, previous studies have shown that EF is enhanced following a single bout (i.e., dose) of exercise (also called acute exercise) [1][2][3][4].…”

Causes and Consequences of Interindividual Response Variability: A Call to Apply a More Rigorous Research Design in Acute Exercise-Cognition Studies

“…However, our knowledge regarding the influence of an adjusted exercise prescription on neurocognitive outcome parameters is meager. In this context, there are findings showing that exercise prescription of acute physical exercise [e.g., exercise intensity, mode of exercise protocol (continuous vs. interval training), or type of exercise (physical exercise with or without motor/cognitive activities)] influences neurocognitive parameters such as cognitive performance at the group level (Budde et al, 2008(Budde et al, , 2010Lambourne and Tomporowski, 2010;Chang et al, 2012;Netz, 2019;Oberste et al, 2019Oberste et al, , 2021Pontifex et al, 2019) or functional brain activity patterns (Mehren et al, 2019). Moreover, there is a good theoretical rationale that the exercise prescription influences the interindividual response variability of neurocognitive outcomes (Herold et al, 2019).…”