2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04524-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effect of passive one-legged intermittent static stretching on regional blood flow in young men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study, the blood flow in the posterior tibial arteries increased for 10 s after the 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching, but significant changes in HR and CO were not observed during both the stretching and relaxation periods. This result is consistent with our previous study [ 11 ], which reported no change in HR during the stretching and relaxation periods in the same 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching. Moreover, this study showed that parasympathetic activity, estimated by LF/HF, did not change before and after the acute passive calf intermittent static stretching (30 s × 6 sets) which used different relaxation periods, and it concomitantly did not alter HR, SBP, and DBP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this study, the blood flow in the posterior tibial arteries increased for 10 s after the 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching, but significant changes in HR and CO were not observed during both the stretching and relaxation periods. This result is consistent with our previous study [ 11 ], which reported no change in HR during the stretching and relaxation periods in the same 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching. Moreover, this study showed that parasympathetic activity, estimated by LF/HF, did not change before and after the acute passive calf intermittent static stretching (30 s × 6 sets) which used different relaxation periods, and it concomitantly did not alter HR, SBP, and DBP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The diameter and mean blood velocity were used to calculate the posterior tibial artery blood flow and shear rate. Blood flow was calculated as: mean blood velocity × π (vessel diameter/2) 2 × 60 [ 11 , 12 , 15 ], where blood flow was measured in milliliters per minute (mL/min). Shear rate (per second), a useful estimator of shear stress that does not account for blood viscosity, was defined as: [4 × mean blood velocity]/vessel diameter [ 11 , 12 , 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations