2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effect of foot strike patterns on in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics during barefoot running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anatomic coordinate systems of the models were created by the same skilled researchers based on a previously described method ( Figure 1C ) ( Yamaguchi et al, 2009 ; Ye et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomic coordinate systems of the models were created by the same skilled researchers based on a previously described method ( Figure 1C ) ( Yamaguchi et al, 2009 ; Ye et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A whole image of the foot during the stance phase was regarded as valid data if the right foot entered the acquisition area and the entire stance phase was captured. One valid data set was selected for each trial for analysis ( Campbell et al, 2016 ; Welte et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Ye et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the dual-fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) has gradually been applied in the fields of sports analysis and injury prevention ( Cao et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Ye et al, 2023 ). DFIS has the advantages of non-invasiveness, highly accurate testing, high repeatability and ability to dynamically capture skeletal in vivo movement; it is not affected by skin and soft tissue movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of cushioned running shoes, researchers found that 95.1% of recreational shod runners run with a rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) ( de Almeida et al, 2015 ). Considerable differences in the biomechanics of lower limb joints have been found among different foot strike patterns over the last 10 years ( Almeida et al, 2015 ; Yong et al, 2020 ; Xu et al, 2021 ; Ye et al, 2024 ). Compared with runners with a RFS, those with a forefoot strike pattern (FFS) exhibit greater knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion during initial contact ( Almeida et al, 2015 ) and greater plantar flexion torque during the early stance phase ( Kulmala et al, 2013 ; Gonzales et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%