2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effect of foot orthoses on frequency domain of ground reaction forces in male children with flexible flatfeet during walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Overall, amplitudes of vertical GRFs components at posttest were lower than at pretest. These results are consistent with the study of Alavi-Mehr et al, 35 although they evaluated the acute effect of FOs on the frequency domain of GRFs in boys with flexible FF. Our results demonstrated that long-term use of FOs could be applied to obtain functional improvements in children with flexible FF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…27 Overall, amplitudes of vertical GRFs components at posttest were lower than at pretest. These results are consistent with the study of Alavi-Mehr et al, 35 although they evaluated the acute effect of FOs on the frequency domain of GRFs in boys with flexible FF. Our results demonstrated that long-term use of FOs could be applied to obtain functional improvements in children with flexible FF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The absence of a significant difference between groups may be related to the characteristics of the WBB measuring equipment, which (only can) measure the magnitude of the force applied in the vertical direction. Previously, (31), also reported no difference in GRF in the vertical direction for male children with and without an orthosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To eliminate foot size and footwear as confounding factors, all of the participants were tested with the identical high-top basketball shoes (Wade 6, Li Ning, Beijing, China) with US size 9.0 were used with the two orthoses conditions (medial-arch support versus flat control) for this study. The tested orthoses were fabricated with the insole milling machines (CNC Milling machine, Vulcan series, Sensor Medica, Italy) and the height of medial-arch support and forefoot/rearfoot thickness were based upon previous studies (Alavi-Mehr et al, 2018;Zhai et al, in press). The two orthoses were identical in terms of material, thickness and hardness, except for the inclusion of medial-arch support (see Fig.…”
Section: Orthosis and Shoe Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%