2006
DOI: 10.1093/jee/99.5.1579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Contact Toxicity of Oxalic Acid to Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and Their Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Hosts in Laboratory Bioassays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 48 h-LD 50 value obtained was slightly higher than that recently reported by Aliano et al (2006). However, in their work the OA was dissolved in acetone and the different solvent used could have influenced OA absortion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The 48 h-LD 50 value obtained was slightly higher than that recently reported by Aliano et al (2006). However, in their work the OA was dissolved in acetone and the different solvent used could have influenced OA absortion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…We used bioassay data from Aliano et al (2006) to determine the maximum volume of OA to apply to the packages. Aliano et al (2006) estimated the 48 h LD 50 for adult honey bees to be 372 μg per bee (95% CL = 307-440 μg per bee).…”
Section: Stocking Of Packagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliano et al (2006) estimated the 48 h LD 50 for adult honey bees to be 372 μg per bee (95% CL = 307-440 μg per bee). We picked a high volume of 15 ml of a 2.8% OA solution per package to approximate a dose that was slightly less than the 48 h LD 50 for adult honey bees (equivalent to 9.3 ml per 1,000 bees).…”
Section: Stocking Of Packagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOEL and LOEL were determined by one-way ANOVA after assessing the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance by the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. The determined mean LD50 value was compared with those reported by Aliano et al (2006) (372.01 µg OA per honeybee) and Martín-Hernández et al (2007) (530 µg OA per honeybee). This was compared by Student's t test for a single sample after assessing the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance by the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested OA dose is estimated per hive and based on a certain number of honeybees; however, these factors may be different in SWZU because of the local environmental conditions and the genetic mixture of Apis mellifera scutellata (Fewell and Bertram, 2002;Diniz et al, 2003;Carrasco-Letelier et al, 2012). There is also a lack of agreement between OA doses used and suggested in Uruguay (Campá et al, 2007;Ramallo et al, 2008) and the doses recommended in other studies, such as those by Aliano et al (2006) and Martín-Hernández et al (2007). In Uruguay, the OA dose is normally applied by trickling 5 mL per bee space (30-50 mL per hive) in a sucrose solution 1:1; a dose of 62.6 g L -1 (Campá et al, 2007) is administered in summer with brood as a strategy to reduce the varroa population, avoid the use of synthetic miticides, and allow a better performance of synthetic miticides in autumn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%