2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute combination fracture of atlas and axis: “triple” anterior screw fixation in a 92-year-old man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When feasible, it ensures early maximal stability, even if it slightly reduces the mobility of C1-C2 complex. 1 We apply this technique through two small cervical incisions, which differs from that of Apostolides et al, 2 who described a single approach through which three screws were placed. Lots of reports have described the technique clinically and anatomically and mentioned the rare, if any, damage to the vertebral artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When feasible, it ensures early maximal stability, even if it slightly reduces the mobility of C1-C2 complex. 1 We apply this technique through two small cervical incisions, which differs from that of Apostolides et al, 2 who described a single approach through which three screws were placed. Lots of reports have described the technique clinically and anatomically and mentioned the rare, if any, damage to the vertebral artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been two reports of 92-and 85-year-old men with 'triple' anterior screw fixation technique. 1,2 We report the successful result obtained in a young patient affected by an acute combination atlas-type II odontoid fracture and treated with anterior odontoid and bilateral C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Anterior transarticular screw (ATAS) fixation across the atlantoaxial joint has been suggested as a viable alternative to posterior stabilization in the upper cervical spine [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Fixation through the anterior route may be advantageous in some patients requiring subsequent stabilization after anterior decompression because it obviates the need for additional posterior surgery [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be used as a complementary option if previous posterior fixation and fusion have failed to provide adequate stability [1,18]. Furthermore, it may be a reasonable option in selected cases in polytrauma, respiratory-compromised [4], or hemodynamically vulnerable elderly patients [5,6], wherein a prone position may increase operative morbidity and/or mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation