2016
DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.gks161496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute clinical adverse radiation effects after Gamma Knife surgery for vestibular schwannomas

Abstract: OBJECTIVEVestibular schwannomas (VSs) represent a common indication of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). While most studies focus on the long-term morbidity and adverse radiation effects (AREs), none describe the acute clinical AREs that might appear on a short-term basis. These types of events are investigated, and their incidence, type, and outcomes are reported in the present paper.METHODSThe included patients were treated between July 2010 and March 2016, underwent at least 6 months of follow-up, and presented wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beside the previous, only a small number of papers have described this particular and rare pathology, in non-radiosurgical setting, in the frame of case reports or small series [10]. In our experience, we report no acute or subacute adverse radiation effects in this indication, both for ICS and for IVS, as we have previously reported in our overall series of VSs treated with GKR [21]. Symptom stability was confirmed on four out of five cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside the previous, only a small number of papers have described this particular and rare pathology, in non-radiosurgical setting, in the frame of case reports or small series [10]. In our experience, we report no acute or subacute adverse radiation effects in this indication, both for ICS and for IVS, as we have previously reported in our overall series of VSs treated with GKR [21]. Symptom stability was confirmed on four out of five cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…During dosimetry planning, special attention was given to the dose received by the cochlea in patients with functional hearing at baseline [14]. Due to the particular anatomical location, we also defined the vestibule, as the structure that is very close anatomically to the cochlea, and which might be subjected to dose increase when limiting the dose to the cochlea, as in our previously described methodology [21].…”
Section: Description Of the Gks Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one consideration would be if there was an increased incidence of treatment side effects or their functional impact with aging. This may happen if there are existing balance problems, for instance, (more likely in the elderly) which may be exacerbated with both surgical or radiotherapy treatment 14 and lead to loss of independence. Also, because of decreased remaining life expectancy with aging, there is simply less time to accrue bad outcomes from the underlying disease or indeed from its treatment (e.g., malignant change from radiotherapy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same sense, what would be the equivalent of the single fraction maximal cochlear dose corresponding to the 3 and 5 fraction cases, if we would have considered 5 Gy as the upper limit for one fraction? It is now well acknowledged that while treating VSs with serviceable hearing with SRS, the maximal dose received by the cochlea should be kept below 5 Gy, so as to give maximal chances to preserve hearing on short and long-term basis [4][5][6][7] . In this sense, hearing loss is not really astonishing in the single fraction group.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%