2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1131-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute cholecystitis: the golden 72-h period is not a strict limit to perform early cholecystectomy. Results from 316 consecutive patients

Abstract: The timing of cholecystectomy for AC does not seem to affect conversion rate and postoperative morbidity. Therefore the 72-h period should not be considered a strict limit to perform LC, provided that the operation is carried out during the initial hospital admission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in a meta-analysis recognizing the superiority of early surgery, the time limit is variable from 48 h to seven days [12] and recent evidence has not shown clinical advantage with this strict temporal limit. [24][25][26] One question rises looking at the gap between clinical and economic advantages of index cholecystectomy for AAC and the "reluctance" to apply ELC: why? One reason could be still related to the surgeon fair for an anecdotal belief of higher common bile duct injury and higher conversion rate in the acute setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in a meta-analysis recognizing the superiority of early surgery, the time limit is variable from 48 h to seven days [12] and recent evidence has not shown clinical advantage with this strict temporal limit. [24][25][26] One question rises looking at the gap between clinical and economic advantages of index cholecystectomy for AAC and the "reluctance" to apply ELC: why? One reason could be still related to the surgeon fair for an anecdotal belief of higher common bile duct injury and higher conversion rate in the acute setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In critically ill patients, although percutaneous gallbladder drainage is recommended due to its clinical efficacy and simplicity, the morbidity associated with this procedure is high. At present, controversy regarding this treatment exists, and no evidence indicates its use [40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Although early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is generally accepted, 7 recent research questions conventional wisdom when it comes to the elderly or medically unfit patient. [15][16][17][18] First, percutaneous cholecystostomy may not be lifesaving. 16 Second, delaying cholecystectomy in high-risk patients beyond the day of admission serves only to increase operative difficulty and prolong overall length of stay without reducing 30-day morbidity or mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%