“…They have also shown that CCTA is associated with reduced time to-diagnosis, reduced length of hospital stay and reduced cost 35 , 36 . However, a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials in patients with acute chest pain found that there was no difference in the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or major adverse cardiac events between the CCTA and standard care groups 37 Table 2Randomized controlled trials of CCTA improving outcomes in acute chest pain 35 , 36 , 66 , 67 . | ACRIN-PA | BEACON | CATCH | CT-COMPARE | CT-STAT | Nabi et al | PERFECT | PROSPECT | ROMICAT-II |
Number of patients | 1368 | 490 | 576 | 562 | 699 | 598 | 395 | 400 | 1000 |
CCTA vs | Stress ECG, stress imaging | Stress ECG, MPI | Stress ECG, MPI | Stress ECG | MPI | MPI | Stress echo., MPI | MPI | Stress ECG, Stress echo., MPI |
Age (mean years) | 50 | 54 | 56 | 52 | 50 | 53 | 60 | 57 | 54 |
Female (%) | 54 | 47 | 45 | 42 | 54 | 56 | 54 | 63 | 47 |
Follow-up (months) | 12 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 12 | 1 |
ACRIN-PA, CT Angiography for Safe Discharge of Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndromes; BEACON, Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography; CATCH, CArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain; CT-COMPARE, CT Coronary Angiography Compared to Exercise ECG; CT-STAT, Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment; PERFECT, Prospective Firs...…”