1999
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc40203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Cervical Spine Injuries: Prospective MR Imaging Assessment at a Level 1 Trauma Center

Abstract: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection of a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its potential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] In our study, whole spine ADC, FA, and RA values were most significantly reduced and VR was increased significantly for patients with cord hemorrhage. These changes were noted on a regional basis when compared with the control group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] In our study, whole spine ADC, FA, and RA values were most significantly reduced and VR was increased significantly for patients with cord hemorrhage. These changes were noted on a regional basis when compared with the control group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…1 Conventional MR imaging is performed routinely to demonstrate soft-tissue and spinal cord injuries in spinal trauma. [2][3][4] Edema and hemorrhage in the spinal cord following trauma are well demonstrated by MR imaging and may help to predict neurologic outcomes. [5][6][7] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) assesses in vivo changes in random motion of protons in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] For our study, the ADL was considered torn if a focal area of ALL/disk discontinuity could be identified on sagittal T2 or inversion recovery sequences. To further improve our specificity, we excluded patients if a focal point of ligament/disk discontinuity could not be definitively identified or if there was not agreement between the 2 neuroradiologists regarding the presence of ADL disruption.…”
Section: Patient Selection and Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each radiologist documented his results into positive or negative restricted diffusion for infarction via analysis of restricted DWI & ADC mapping, blooming artifact seen on gradient sequencing, perfusion deficit as determined by analysis of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and mean transit time [38][39][40][41][42][43]. In addition, other CNS pathologic etiologies were assayed including: intracranial hemorrhage, spinal cord compression, fracture, spinal canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenoses, disk herniation, and annular fissuring [24,[44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%