2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00777-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute BAF perturbation causes immediate changes in chromatin accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
80
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
18
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By integrating our live-cell SMT measurements with available genome-wide localization and protein expression data, we estimate temporal occupancies ranging from 11  7.2 to 94  41% for RSC, SWI/SNF, INO80, and ISW2 at target promoter regions including the NDR and flanking nucleosomes. Our findings of highly dynamic and frequent remodeler-nucleosome interactions are consistent with recent genomics studies showing substantial changes in nucleosome positions upon rapid, conditional inactivation of remodelers in yeast and mammalian systems (Iurlaro et al, 2021;Klein-Brill et al, 2019;Kubik et al, 2019;Schick et al, 2021). Accordingly, we envision a nucleosome remodeling cycle at promoters in which remodeler combinations undergo frequent association, ATP-dependent mobilization and dissociation from chromatin to dynamically fine-tune -1 and +1 nucleosome positions (Figure 8).…”
Section: A Temporal Model For Nucleosome Remodeling At Ndrssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By integrating our live-cell SMT measurements with available genome-wide localization and protein expression data, we estimate temporal occupancies ranging from 11  7.2 to 94  41% for RSC, SWI/SNF, INO80, and ISW2 at target promoter regions including the NDR and flanking nucleosomes. Our findings of highly dynamic and frequent remodeler-nucleosome interactions are consistent with recent genomics studies showing substantial changes in nucleosome positions upon rapid, conditional inactivation of remodelers in yeast and mammalian systems (Iurlaro et al, 2021;Klein-Brill et al, 2019;Kubik et al, 2019;Schick et al, 2021). Accordingly, we envision a nucleosome remodeling cycle at promoters in which remodeler combinations undergo frequent association, ATP-dependent mobilization and dissociation from chromatin to dynamically fine-tune -1 and +1 nucleosome positions (Figure 8).…”
Section: A Temporal Model For Nucleosome Remodeling At Ndrssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests that although TFs can engage nucleosome-occupied DNA, they may require additional cofactors to persist at high levels on chromatin in vivo. Together with acute ablation or transient inhibition of remodeler activity, these studies have begun to reshape our understanding of site-specific gene activation within chromatin as a highly dynamic system (Iurlaro et al, 2021;Schick et al, 2021). Further time-resolved and molecular dissection of the interplay between site-specific TFs and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers remains critical for our understanding of TF engagement and pioneer activity.…”
Section: Recognition Of Site-specific Dna Motifs In the Context Of A Nucleosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results reveal that FUS‐DDIT3 condensates can compartmentalize BRG1, a key catalytic subunit (ATPase) of mSWI/SNF that is responsible for ATP‐dependent remodeling of DNA‐histone interactions. Since a continuous activity of the mSWI/SNF is often required to maintain the appropriate chromatin state at the target genomic locus, 63,64 the selective enrichment of mSWI/SNF components by FUS‐DDIT3 condensates provides two possible routes to transcriptional reprograming (Figure 5). First, condensates of FET‐fusion proteins formed at ectopic genomic regions, as specified by binding sites of the DNA‐binding domain, can recruit BRG1 and modify local chromatin dynamics to activate transcription (Figure 5 left panel).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%