2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute and protracted disruptions to inhibitory control following sports-related concussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor response inhibition mechanisms regulating sport expertise in athletes performing in different disciplines represents a relevant field of application [ 69 ]. Moreover, since a relationship between neurocognitive deficits and sport injuries has been established, the use of sensitive approaches to assess the neurocognitive status of an athlete may open new avenues to identify athletes at risk of sport injuries [ 70 , 71 ]. Finally, altered inhibitory control characterizes several psychopathological conditions [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor response inhibition mechanisms regulating sport expertise in athletes performing in different disciplines represents a relevant field of application [ 69 ]. Moreover, since a relationship between neurocognitive deficits and sport injuries has been established, the use of sensitive approaches to assess the neurocognitive status of an athlete may open new avenues to identify athletes at risk of sport injuries [ 70 , 71 ]. Finally, altered inhibitory control characterizes several psychopathological conditions [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key nodes of the SN include the anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula, which together play a central role in response inhibition, conflict resolution, and motor planning (Seeley et al, 2007;Kelly et al, 2008;Sridharan et al, 2008;Jilka et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015). Numerous studies of RTI have utilized the flanker test to provide a cognitive challenge that requires more extensive brain activation and network integration than simpler visual stimuli (Kelly et al, 2008;Mennes et al, 2010Mennes et al, , 2011Fjell et al, 2011;Parks et al, 2015;Williams et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017;Olson et al, 2018;McGowan et al, 2019). Disrupted neural communication within and between the DMN, SN, VAN, DAN, and ECN has been documented among individuals who have sustained brain injury (He et al, 2007;Jilka et al, 2014;Churchill et al, 2021), which may slow information processing and cause lapses in attention (i.e., inattentional blindness) that perturb perception (Kenzie et al, 2017).…”
Section: Neural Basis For Inconsistency Of Perceptual-motor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, perception and responses must be allocated to the central target, for which processing of the flanking stimulus must be suppressed using inhibitory control. The suppression of response to the flanking stimuli is required to reduce the possibility of disturbance in the perceptually evoked response, while dominant perceptual cues activate the action schema (Amanda et al, 2019). In inconsistent arrays, where the target and flanking stimuli are mapped to opposite directional modes, there will be greater interference between the correct and incorrect responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%