Clinical Care and Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute and Long-Term Effects of Chemoradiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[24][25][26] Because adding chemotherapy to adjuvant RT is associated with significant increases in acute-and late-treatment toxicity, it is important to precisely define which groups of patients benefit. [3][4][5] By showing that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC who had ENE and underwent margin-negative resection was not associated with improved OS, our study provides hypothesis-generating data that can be used to inform future investigation to help develop therapeutic protocols that maximize oncologic outcomes while minimizing treatment-related morbidity. Our precisely defined cohort was chosen to identify a lowerrisk ENE-positive HNSCC subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11,[24][25][26] Because adding chemotherapy to adjuvant RT is associated with significant increases in acute-and late-treatment toxicity, it is important to precisely define which groups of patients benefit. [3][4][5] By showing that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC who had ENE and underwent margin-negative resection was not associated with improved OS, our study provides hypothesis-generating data that can be used to inform future investigation to help develop therapeutic protocols that maximize oncologic outcomes while minimizing treatment-related morbidity. Our precisely defined cohort was chosen to identify a lowerrisk ENE-positive HNSCC subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Since the publication of these trials, further precision and risk stratification within ENE-positive disease has occurred based on the number of ENE-positive LNs, extent of ENE (ie, macroscopic vs microscopic), and HPV status . Because adding chemotherapy to adjuvant RT is associated with significant increases in acute- and late-treatment toxicity, it is important to precisely define which groups of patients benefit . By showing that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pN2a HPV-negative HNSCC who had ENE and underwent margin-negative resection was not associated with improved OS, our study provides hypothesis-generating data that can be used to inform future investigation to help develop therapeutic protocols that maximize oncologic outcomes while minimizing treatment-related morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…33 Nevertheless, these collective trials established adjuvant CRT as standard of care for patients with ENE per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the basis of high-risk surgically resected HNSCC for subsequent cooperative group trials. 8,34,35 However, because of the significant morbidity associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy concurrent with RT that was also evident in the long-term follow-up of RTOG 9501, 36 there has been an intense effort to define precisely the subset of high-risk patients who benefit from CRT. 34,35,[37][38][39] Because ENE was assessed in a dichotomous fashion (present/absent) in these landmark trials, whether the oncologic benefit of adjuvant CRT applies equally regardless of the extent of ENE (microscopic or macroscopic) is not known.…”
Section: Concurrent Chemoradiation For Ene MImentioning
confidence: 99%