Purpose Endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients is associated with a high risk of complications that tend to increase with multiple attempts at laryngoscopy. In this pilot study, we compared direct laryngoscopy (DL) with videolaryngoscopy (VL) with regard to the number of attempts and other clinical parameters during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients performed by novice providers.Methods Patients were randomized to either VL or DL for endotracheal intubation. Exclusion criteria for the study included: requirement for immediate endotracheal intubation, cervical spine precautions, anticipated difficult intubation, oxygen saturation \ 90%, or systolic blood pressure \ 80 mmHg despite resuscitation. The providers, predominantly non-anesthesiology residents in their first three years of postgraduate training, received a one-hour teaching and mannequin session prior to performing the procedures. Results Forty patients, mean age 65 (standard deviation, 16) yr were randomized to VL (n = 20) or DL (n = 20). Sixty percent of the patients received endotracheal intubation for respiratory failure, and all patients received a neuromuscular blocker. Multiple attempts were required in 25/40 (63%) patients, and this did not differ with technique (P = 1.0) Video-laryngoscopy resulted in improved glottic visualization with 85% of patients having a Cormack-Lehane grade 1 view compared with 30% of patients in the DL group (P \ 0.001). Total time-to-intubation for VL was 221 sec Donald Griesdale was the principle investigator and responsible for the concept and design of the study. He had access to all of the data and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Anton Chau, George Isac, Denise Foster, Corrie Irwin, and Peter Choi were involved in the design of the study. Denise Foster was involved in data acquisition, and Anton Chau, George Isac, Najib Ayas, Denise Foster, and Peter Choi were involved in interpretation of the data. Donald Griesdale, Anton Chau, George Isac, Najib Ayas, Denise Foster, Corrie Irwin, and Peter Choi helped draft the manuscript. Anton Chau, George Isac, Najib Ayas, Denise Foster, and Corrie Irwin critically revised the manuscript. Peter Choi was involved in interpretation of the data, and he also revised the manuscript prior to submission.
RésuméObjectif L'intubation endotrache´ale chez des patients gravement malades est associe´e à un risque e´leve´de complications qui tendent a`eˆtre plus nombreuses apre`s de multiples tentatives de laryngoscopie. Dans cette e´tude pilote, nous avons compare´la laryngoscopie directe (DL) et la vide´o-laryngoscopie (VL) pour ce qui concerne le nombre de tentatives et d'autres parame`tres cliniques au cours de l'intubation endotrache´ale de patients gravement malades re´alise´e par des praticiens novices. Méthodes Les patients ont e´te´randomise´s dans un groupe d'intubation endotrache´ale par VL ou par DL. Les crite`res d'exclusion de l'e´tude e´taient les suivants : ne´cessite´d'une ...