2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Adrenal Insufficiency in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pastrana et al [8] reported that the incidence of AI in cervical SCI patients with neurogenic shock was 22%, which is much lower than that in our study. One explanation for this result is the difference in diagnostic criteria for AI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pastrana et al [8] reported that the incidence of AI in cervical SCI patients with neurogenic shock was 22%, which is much lower than that in our study. One explanation for this result is the difference in diagnostic criteria for AI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, the cutoff for failure was defined as cortisol levels of less than 18 µg/dL sampled at 30 and 60 minutes after ACTH stimulation. However, in the study conducted by Pastrana et al [8], AI was defined as basal cortisol levels less than 15 µg/dL in the presence of neurogenic shock. Another explanation is that steroids for treatment of SCI were not administered as part of the spinal cord protection protocol in that study because of the long-term complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That said, the consequences of missing the diagnosis can be life-threatening. Pastrana et al 19 reported that in 199 steroid-naïve persons with ASCI, AI was identified in 8 of 199 (4%) patients (e.g. 8 of 37 patients who met the criteria for neurogenic shock had AI), and the diagnosis of AI carried a higher risk of complications (P = 0.01), including intubation (P = 0.002), and a non-significant risk increase in 30-day mortality (13 vs. 3%, P = 0.39).…”
Section: Ai In Asci With and Without Glucocorticoid Administration: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the presence of neurogenic shock, AI is reported as high as 22%. 19 While the pathophysiology of AI in ASCI in a steroid-naïve patient is unclear, it is well known that administration of exogenous steroids in ASCI has the potential to suppress the hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) function. This can occur as soon as a few days after steroid administration and is typically dose-dependent.…”
Section: Ai In Asci With and Without Glucocorticoid Administration: Imentioning
confidence: 99%