2021
DOI: 10.1215/00382876-9443280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actually Existing Platformization

Abstract: In this article we examine the partnership as a heterogeneous boundary resource that enables platforms to generate dependencies, become locally embedded, and gain power in urban settings. Pushing back against narratives of platform-driven disruption, which tend to universalize and totalize platform power, we discuss three cases of what we term “actually existing platformization”—a path-dependent and locally situated process in which platform companies engage in various forms of “boundary work” with other actor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of third-party businesses on top of a core platform has created interactive networks that have been interpreted using the perspective of infrastructure studies (Plantin et al 2018;Helmond et al 2019;van Doorn et al 2021). For instance, Plantin et al (2018) suggest that the scale reached by both Google and Facebook ensured that these platforms had some of the properties of infrastructures; essentially, the widely accessible networked structures that became crucial elements for individual users, companies and even governments.…”
Section: Digital Platforms and Student Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of third-party businesses on top of a core platform has created interactive networks that have been interpreted using the perspective of infrastructure studies (Plantin et al 2018;Helmond et al 2019;van Doorn et al 2021). For instance, Plantin et al (2018) suggest that the scale reached by both Google and Facebook ensured that these platforms had some of the properties of infrastructures; essentially, the widely accessible networked structures that became crucial elements for individual users, companies and even governments.…”
Section: Digital Platforms and Student Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen the growing involvement of private, for-profit businesses in disaster management projects. These companies often partner with public bodies and non-profits to deliver goods and services on a charitable basis, arguably with a view of securing an advantageous position in future markets and gather data on potential customers and their consumption patterns (see, for example, the case discussed by van Doorn et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Datafication and Philanthrocapitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas popular and market-promotional discourse celebrates the flexibility that workers enjoy in the platform economy, critical scholars sharply expose that digital platforms, appearing as labor intermediaries, are profiting through labor exploitation of low-income workers globally (Brophy & CMNS444 2020; Chen 2018; Graham et al 2017; Hoang et al 2020; Srnicek 2017; Sun 2019; Ticona & Mateescu 2018; van Doorn 2017; van Doorn et al 2021). Niels van Doorn’s (2017: 900) definition of platform labor/work as ‘digitally mediated service work’ is useful here to differentiate the platform gig economy from other types of platform economy – such as sharing economy, peer-to-peer and business-to-business platforms, financial platforms, and social media platforms – despite their interdependence (Bouchard et al 2021).…”
Section: Situating Platform Work In the Continuum Of Labor Exploitationmentioning
confidence: 99%