2008
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.2.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual Versus Projected Cost Avoidance for Clinical Pharmacy Specialist -Initiated Medication Conversions in a Primary Care Setting in an Integrated Health System

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Primary care clinical pharmacy specialists (PCCPSs) are positioned to promote effective, safe, and affordable medication use. Documentation of performed interventions is difficult because the diversity of performed interventions in a variety of disease states in some practice settings. Validation of cost-avoidance projections is also difficult because traditional projection methods have several limitations.OBJECTIVE: To (1) compare projected medication cost avoidance (MCA) to actual MCA for medicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Kaiser Permanente Northern California automated databases have been shown to be comprehensive and accurate,8 9 we conducted a validation study of the diagnoses of malformations by comparing the diagnoses between medical charts and our clinical databases. We randomly selected 237 maternal-infant pairs for a validation study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Kaiser Permanente Northern California automated databases have been shown to be comprehensive and accurate,8 9 we conducted a validation study of the diagnoses of malformations by comparing the diagnoses between medical charts and our clinical databases. We randomly selected 237 maternal-infant pairs for a validation study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a recent (2008) study of pharmacist interventions, conducted by Kroner el al., found that projected medication cost savings overstated actual cost savings by 14%. 17 However the Kroner et al study was limited to medication conversion savings and did not include cost-saving analyses of other resources, such as physician visits and hospitalizations, which were included in the present study. Second, the absence of a comparison group makes this a descriptive report without the ability to attribute outcomes to the pharmacist interventions; there is no way to determine if the billed MTM intervention would have been performed without the MTM administrative services company's network, either by another health care provider or by a patient representative.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a simple approach of differences between projected and actual expenditures during the performance year as this study's primary outcome variable. 12 Alternative values for projected expenditures were calculated using 4 alternative inflation or cost-trend assumptions (other factors remaining constant). The most locally relevant analysis used Georgia's own cost-trend assumptions for their non-dually-eligible disabled Medicaid population.…”
Section: Analytic and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%