Actors' balancing of criteria when translating an idea

Abstract

PurposeTaking the model of association as a point of departure the research question asked in the paper is: what is the role of translators and their criteria for choices in the translation of clinical pathways in a psychiatric ward?Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on an explorative single case‐study. Data were collected through participative observation and document studies. A temporal bracketing approach to process studies were used where the chain of events were broken down into chronologically organized episodes and then submitted to rigorous analysis.FindingsThe case‐analysis demonstrates that the role of human translators is to construct meaningful narratives that mobilize and enrol human as well as non‐human actors. Different translation proposals and translation criteria are continuously constructed, negotiated, tested out and weighted or balanced against each other by humans through the use of narratives. The analysis also demonstrates that other actors than humans may act and influence the translation process.Originality/valueThe model of association has until now been less precise and needs development of its theorization of the role of human translators and their criteria for choices in local organizing processes. The paper contributes to this development by means of an explorative case‐study.

Knowledge Transfer as Translation: Review and Elements of an Instrumental Theory

“…This predominantly reflects the research methods applied in such works, which are ex post studies within large populations of organizations, and with modest access to process data indicating what happens to the diffusing ideas after their formal adoption. Here, the translation camp has advanced understanding, partly by theorizing the disseminated constructs as ideas that are continually shaped and reshaped, and partly through longitudinal studies of adoption and translation processes from inside various fields (Frenkel ; Özen and Berkman ; Zilber ) and individual organizations (Dooreward and Van Bijsterveld ; Mennicken ; Scheuer ; Tomson ; Whittle et al . ).…”