Actor-Centered Social Work: Re-visioning "Person-in-Environment" through a Critical Theory Lens

Abstract

The ecosystems perspective has become the most prevalent approach for understanding the relationship between person and social environment. It views the individual and larger social systems as separate but contiguous elements that transact with each other in relationships of mutual influence. This article revisions the relationship between person and social environment through the lens of critical theory. Emphasizing distinctively human characteristics, arguments define human actors as coconstructors of, not just interactors within, their social environments. It is suggested that the individual is "in" the larger social system not so much the way a smaller box is contained within a larger box but rather the way dancers are in a ballet or a football team is in a game. The dancers and the players co-constitute the dance and the game. Although human behavior is shaped by society and its structures, those very structures are recursively constructed, maintained, and reproduced by the social actions of human agents over time. Implications for social work practice, research, and education are discussed.

Social Service Barriers Experienced by Low-Income Extended-Stay Hotel Residents

“…According to structuration theory, people must have knowledge of implicit and explicit system rules to skillfully access resources in order to harness power for social mobilization (Kondrat, 2002). Since social service workers strive to improve the social conditions of clientele, a primary goal of intervention must be to produce knowledgeable social actors.…”

Practice wisdom: the art and science of social work

“…Zimmerman (1989) discussed the concept of 'equifinality' which essentially stated that a person can arrive at the same destination in many ways and there is no 'right answer' to the complex problems human beings can encounter in life. People are strongly influenced by the structures and institutions in society that socially construct their realities (Kondrat, 2002). Both context and reflexivity are critical components to both effective practice and research in social work.…”

Critique des fondements et usages de l’écosystémie dans le domaine du partenariat école-famille-communauté : application d’une perspective contextuelle et socioculturelle dans le cadre du programme Famille, école, communauté, réussir ensemble

“…Ceci a l'avantage d'en faire un « paradigme » de référence générique qui se décline en un ensemble d'approches et de modèles et qui se prête à différentes perspectives épistémologiques. Par ailleurs, cette même caractéristique a le défaut de la constituer comme une « coquille vide » parfois dénuée de sens, ceci en raison, particulièrement, du rapport restreint et problématique qu'entretiennent les auteurs avec ses fondements (Kondrat, 2002;Sontag, 1996). La nature des fondements et du rapport qu'y entretiennent les chercheurs a des incidences sur la pratique des divers intervenants.…”