2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10974-016-9458-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actomyosin based contraction: one mechanokinetic model from single molecules to muscle?

Abstract: Bridging the gaps between experimental systems on different hierarchical scales is needed to overcome remaining challenges in the understanding of muscle contraction. Here, a mathematical model with well-characterized structural and biochemical actomyosin states is developed to that end. We hypothesize that this model accounts for generation of force and motion from single motor molecules to the large ensembles of muscle. In partial support of this idea, a wide range of contractile phenomena are reproduced wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
104
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(216 reference statements)
13
104
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the model in Figure 6 , each myosin head in single-molecule studies attaches to actin in the state A 1 at a given x-value. Because the attachment step is most likely rate limiting for the cycle [ 210 ], the subsequent inter-state transitions would be comparatively rapid [ 165 , 211 ] consistent with observations in ultra-fast force spectroscopy of single molecules [ 64 ]. For instance, if the free energy of the state A 2 is lower than that of state A 1 at the x-value where the cross-bridge attaches, a virtually immediate transition from state A 1 to state A 2 will follow.…”
Section: Key Cross-bridge Characteristics From Single Molecules Tomentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the model in Figure 6 , each myosin head in single-molecule studies attaches to actin in the state A 1 at a given x-value. Because the attachment step is most likely rate limiting for the cycle [ 210 ], the subsequent inter-state transitions would be comparatively rapid [ 165 , 211 ] consistent with observations in ultra-fast force spectroscopy of single molecules [ 64 ]. For instance, if the free energy of the state A 2 is lower than that of state A 1 at the x-value where the cross-bridge attaches, a virtually immediate transition from state A 1 to state A 2 will follow.…”
Section: Key Cross-bridge Characteristics From Single Molecules Tomentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Other sets of classical experiments include studies of the relationship between the force developed by the muscle and the shortening or lengthening velocity (the force-velocity relationship) related to the energetics of contraction and ultrastructure [ 143 , 145 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 ]. Such experiments have been of critical importance for development of models for muscle contraction [ 156 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 ]. By being an ensemble property, the force-velocity relationship has no direct counterpart in single-molecule experiments.…”
Section: Mechanical Experiments On Muscle Cells and Myofibrils—conmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Major strengths of all versions of the models tested here are independent origin of model parameter values primarily from biochemical and single molecule studies of actin and myosin, as described by Månsson (2016) and Rahman et al (2018). Parameter values have further been obtained under Potma et al 1995).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Models And Rationale Behindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In absence of load, ⑥ is fast. Under high load as during isometric contraction, ⑥ is slow, so that g becomes similar or even lower than f. The isometric ATPase rate (ATPase ∼ 1/f + 1/g) is mainly limited by g, whereas the rate of force redevelopment (k TR ∼ f + g) is also determined by f. Models modified from (Lymn and Taylor 1971) (a) and (Dantzig et al 1992;Capitanio et al 2006;Houdusse and Sweeney 2016) Capitanio et al 2006;Siththanandan et al 2006;Caremani et al 2013;Smith 2014;Dong and Chen 2016;Geeves 2016;Houdusse and Sweeney 2016;Mansson 2016;Mijailovich et al 2017).…”
Section: Force Generation During the Cross-bridge Atpase Cycle: An Opmentioning
confidence: 99%