2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41043-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity Recognition System Using Non-intrusive Devices through a Complementary Technique Based on Discrete Methods

Abstract: This paper aims to develop a cheap, comfortable and, specially, efficient system which controls the physical activity carried out by the user. For this purpose an extended approach to physical activity recognition is presented, based on the use of discrete variables which employ data from accelerometer sensors. To this end, an innovative selection, discretization and classification technique to make the recognition process in an efficient way and at low energy cost, is presented in this work based on Ameva dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The winner team of 2012 edition (USS team) [37], composed of three of the authors of this paper, obtained acceptable results in accuracy (it was below that of the CMUU team), but its simplicity (although it uses multiple mathematical methods it only relies on accelerometers) and interoperability allowed it to achieve good marks in all the evaluated criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The winner team of 2012 edition (USS team) [37], composed of three of the authors of this paper, obtained acceptable results in accuracy (it was below that of the CMUU team), but its simplicity (although it uses multiple mathematical methods it only relies on accelerometers) and interoperability allowed it to achieve good marks in all the evaluated criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The results obtained in this phase are described in [21] and have been used to present the system to the EVAAL competition. After peer review, our team was accepted to the competition together with the teams: IJS (from the Jožef Stefan Institute of Ljubljana, Slovenia) [84], AmevaActivity (from the University of Seville, Spain) [85], and CUJ (from the University of Chiba, Japan) [86]. Competitors were invited to install and run their Activity Recognition System (ARS) during a predefined time slot.…”
Section: Fielding the System In A Real Smart Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%