2013 Ieee Ro-Man 2013
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2013.6628549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity recognition system for watching over infant children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children wore the sensor one full day (9 a.m.–4 p.m.) and performed a series of activities in a set order, each for 10 min to 2 h duration with some free-time light activities in between. Goto, 2013 [ 27 ] n = 10, 3–5 years old, sex not stated, clinical/TD not reported, recruited via childcare centre, Japan. To develop and evaluate a single arm sensor and SOM system to classify infant activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children wore the sensor one full day (9 a.m.–4 p.m.) and performed a series of activities in a set order, each for 10 min to 2 h duration with some free-time light activities in between. Goto, 2013 [ 27 ] n = 10, 3–5 years old, sex not stated, clinical/TD not reported, recruited via childcare centre, Japan. To develop and evaluate a single arm sensor and SOM system to classify infant activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the papers included an even number of male and female participants. The age range varied widely: eight papers included children under the age of 3 years, four papers included children aged between 3–5 years [ 26 , 27 , 33 , 34 ], and the remaining 12 papers included children over the age of 5 years or adults with a small set of children who fit the inclusion criteria. Some of these only included one participant fitting the inclusion criteria or were unclear in how many participants of each age were within the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it was simulated at two cases which the start position S and the target position G of the mass robot is different. In the 1st case it is assumed S 1 = [1, 1] G 1 = [13,9], and in the 2nd case assumes S 2 = [2, 9] G 2 = [7,3]. Indexes of S and G shows 1st case and 2nd case.…”
Section: Navigation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(A) : the start position and the target position is (1,1) and (13,9) and Fig. 4(B) : the start position and the target position is (2,9) and (7,3). Where the radius of the moving objects in M space is assumed to be 0.03.…”
Section: Navigation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation