2022
DOI: 10.3390/signals3020017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity Recognition Based on Millimeter-Wave Radar by Fusing Point Cloud and Range–Doppler Information

Abstract: Millimeter-wave radar has demonstrated its high efficiency in complex environments in recent years, which outperforms LiDAR and computer vision in human activity recognition in the presence of smoke, fog, and dust. In previous studies, researchers mostly analyzed either 2D (3D) point cloud or range–Doppler information from radar echo to extract activity features. In this paper, we propose a multi-model deep learning approach to fuse the features of both point clouds and range–Doppler for classifying six activi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we can notice that the Radar I classifier was able to classify each activity with reasonable precision and recall, irrespective of the strategy used to split the Radar I feature vectors into training and test sets. However, comparing the results of the Radar I classifier with other existing works on mmWave radar-based HAR [15,[20][21][22][23][24][25], it can be argued that the recognition accuracy of the Radar I classifier is at the lower end. This is due to the fact that the Radar I classifier attempted to recognize orientation-independent activities, unlike other approaches that recognized activities performed along the 0°aspect angle.…”
Section: Results Of the Radar I And Radar Ii Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we can notice that the Radar I classifier was able to classify each activity with reasonable precision and recall, irrespective of the strategy used to split the Radar I feature vectors into training and test sets. However, comparing the results of the Radar I classifier with other existing works on mmWave radar-based HAR [15,[20][21][22][23][24][25], it can be argued that the recognition accuracy of the Radar I classifier is at the lower end. This is due to the fact that the Radar I classifier attempted to recognize orientation-independent activities, unlike other approaches that recognized activities performed along the 0°aspect angle.…”
Section: Results Of the Radar I And Radar Ii Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In recent years, the use of mmWave radar as an RF sensing technology has increased in various human-centric applications, such as HAR [15,[20][21][22]24,25]; gesture recognition [28][29][30]; gait recognition [31,32]; human step counting [4]; fall detection [23,33]; and sign language gesture recognition [34]. In general, the tasks of recognizing human activities, (sign language) gestures, and detecting accidental falls using mmWave radar follow similar steps.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations