2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00175-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity, oral behaviour and slaughter data as welfare indicators in veal calves: a comparison of three housing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
66
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Stull and McDonough (1994) reported that housing calves in individual stalls better results for NS not significant; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 Table 2 The feed intake (grams/day) values based on either average daily weight gain or the proportion of the body weight (feed intake/live weight (LW); %) and the feed conversion efficiency (FCE; kilograms feed/kilogram weight gain) during the fattening period fattening performance of late period of growth when compared housing in group pens. The adrenal glands of both groups were weighted after the slaughtering in the view of the literature (Veisser et al 1997;Bokkers and Koenne 2001) in order to determine the stress in the IC group, which could be caused by the locomotors inactivity and social depression; although, the proportion of the adrenal glands in the dressing percentage was not significantly important (Table 3). Veisser et al (1997) and Bokkers and Koenne (2001) reported that housing system did not significantly affect on adrenal gland weight of calves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, Stull and McDonough (1994) reported that housing calves in individual stalls better results for NS not significant; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 Table 2 The feed intake (grams/day) values based on either average daily weight gain or the proportion of the body weight (feed intake/live weight (LW); %) and the feed conversion efficiency (FCE; kilograms feed/kilogram weight gain) during the fattening period fattening performance of late period of growth when compared housing in group pens. The adrenal glands of both groups were weighted after the slaughtering in the view of the literature (Veisser et al 1997;Bokkers and Koenne 2001) in order to determine the stress in the IC group, which could be caused by the locomotors inactivity and social depression; although, the proportion of the adrenal glands in the dressing percentage was not significantly important (Table 3). Veisser et al (1997) and Bokkers and Koenne (2001) reported that housing system did not significantly affect on adrenal gland weight of calves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adrenal glands of both groups were weighted after the slaughtering in the view of the literature (Veisser et al 1997;Bokkers and Koenne 2001) in order to determine the stress in the IC group, which could be caused by the locomotors inactivity and social depression; although, the proportion of the adrenal glands in the dressing percentage was not significantly important (Table 3). Veisser et al (1997) and Bokkers and Koenne (2001) reported that housing system did not significantly affect on adrenal gland weight of calves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lying seems more linked to the housing system than to SF provision, with grouphoused calves (i.e., 40-80 calves per pen) fed MR via AMD lying more than conventional group-housed (i.e., 5 to 7 calves per pen) or individually housed calves (Bokkers and Koene, 2001). In the present study we observed a decrease in lying (i.e., increase in activity) in AMD calves from 15 to 24 wk of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diets commonly used in veal production have been linked with several welfare impairments, including behavioral and gastrointestinal health problems (Bokkers and Koene, 2001;Brscic et al, 2011). Veal calves develop abnormal oral behaviors such as excessive oral manipulation of the pen and abnormal rolling of the tongue, that is, tongue playing (Leruste et al, 2014), most likely due to an inadequate provision of solid feed (SF) and, in particular, insufficient structure in the SF (Mattiello et al, 2002;Webb et al, 2013;Leruste et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%