2017
DOI: 10.1002/bip.23032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity of synthetic peptides against Chlamydia

Abstract: The in vitro activity of six synthetic peptides against 36 strains of Chlamydia from different origins was investigated. Clavanin MO (CMO) proved to be the most active peptide, reducing the inclusion number of all Chlamydia strains from eight different species tested by ≥50% at 10 µg mL . Mastoparan L showed an equal activity against C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae, C. suis, and C. muridarum, but did not exert any inhibitory effect against C. psittaci, C. pecorum, C. abortus, and C. avium even at 80 µg mL . Thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence of antibiotic resistance should be the driver for development and application of new antichlamydials in veterinary medicine. Efforts for these are already underway, including in animals (Lawrence et al, 2016), exploiting a range of strategies to target Chlamydia -specific cell structures and/or known virulence factors (Ur-Rehman et al, 2012; Marti et al, 2014; Koroleva et al, 2015; Rahn et al, 2016; Donati et al, 2017; Papa et al, 2017; Figure 1). Regardless of years of research into chlamydia control through immunoprophylaxis there are almost no viable chlamydial vaccines to date.…”
Section: Future Directions and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of antibiotic resistance should be the driver for development and application of new antichlamydials in veterinary medicine. Efforts for these are already underway, including in animals (Lawrence et al, 2016), exploiting a range of strategies to target Chlamydia -specific cell structures and/or known virulence factors (Ur-Rehman et al, 2012; Marti et al, 2014; Koroleva et al, 2015; Rahn et al, 2016; Donati et al, 2017; Papa et al, 2017; Figure 1). Regardless of years of research into chlamydia control through immunoprophylaxis there are almost no viable chlamydial vaccines to date.…”
Section: Future Directions and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%