1992
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(92)90086-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity measurements of zinc in soils of different pH using EDTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to McBride and Blasiak (56), a 97% decrease in Zn concentration was observed in acidic soil for each unit increase in soil pH between 5 and 7. Sachdev et al (57) reported that the Zn 2+ activity decreased approximately 99% for each unit increase in pH. In the present study, as with available Zn, this Zn fraction (F1) diminished with time in both soils (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…According to McBride and Blasiak (56), a 97% decrease in Zn concentration was observed in acidic soil for each unit increase in soil pH between 5 and 7. Sachdev et al (57) reported that the Zn 2+ activity decreased approximately 99% for each unit increase in pH. In the present study, as with available Zn, this Zn fraction (F1) diminished with time in both soils (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It is well accepted that precipitation of Zn is most likely in alkaline soils with a pH range of 7-8 (Brü mmer et al, 1983). According to Sachdev et al (1992), the Zn 2+ activity decreases approximately 100-fold for each unit increase in pH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Examples of the former are ion-selective electrodes for Cu (11)(12)(13)(14)(15) and Cd (16) and anodic stripping voltammetry (where electrochemically labile metal complexes are measured and can include both organic and inorganic complexes) (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Nonelectrochemical methods include ion-exchange resins (17,18,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), competitive chelation (27,28), and ultrafiltration and dialysis (13,20,29). Most of these methods suffer from chemical interferences, poor limits of detection, or disturbance of solution equilibria (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%