1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5861(96)00246-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity and selectivity of precipitated iron Fischer-Tropsch catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with a higher surface hydrogen concentration in H 2 -pretreated catalysts, which probably results in a higher hydrogenation activity and chain termination reactions and, thus, in low molar mass products. Contrarily, higher conversions were obtained over unsupported Fe/Si/K catalysts when the activation was performed in pure CO. [141] Apart from the fact that different activation treatments lead to different iron species in the fresh catalysts, either unsupported or prepared over different supports, the iron phases can be also distributed between several species (carbides, oxides, and metallic iron) during the FTS reaction. This fluctuating behavior reinforces the difficulties in determining a correlation between the catalyst composition and its activity and selectivity.…”
Section: Methods Of Catalyst Preparation: Synthesis and Pretreatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with a higher surface hydrogen concentration in H 2 -pretreated catalysts, which probably results in a higher hydrogenation activity and chain termination reactions and, thus, in low molar mass products. Contrarily, higher conversions were obtained over unsupported Fe/Si/K catalysts when the activation was performed in pure CO. [141] Apart from the fact that different activation treatments lead to different iron species in the fresh catalysts, either unsupported or prepared over different supports, the iron phases can be also distributed between several species (carbides, oxides, and metallic iron) during the FTS reaction. This fluctuating behavior reinforces the difficulties in determining a correlation between the catalyst composition and its activity and selectivity.…”
Section: Methods Of Catalyst Preparation: Synthesis and Pretreatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex interplay between primary and secondary reactions [129] requires catalyst comparison at similar levels of CO-conversion [27,114] in similar type of reactors. This kind of data is not readily available in the open literature and makes it difficult to judge claims and reports of enhanced liquid product selectivity through the introduction of promoters.…”
Section: Selectivity In the Fischer-tropsch Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…250°C [47,114,115,136]. This does not imply a lower liquid product selectivity with cobalt-based catalysts, but rather a higher selectivity on iron-based catalysts for other light hydrocarbon gases (C 2 -C 4 ).…”
Section: Selectivity In the Fischer-tropsch Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron-based FTS catalysts are generally promoted with chemical, structural and reduction promoters such as potassium, Al 2 O 3 and copper to improve their performance [8]. Copper can enhance the reducibility of iron oxides to metallic iron [9,10], and potassium as a chemical promoter can aid the augmentation of hydrocarbon chain growth. Al 2 O 3 is a structural promoter that preserves the catalyst's structure against sintering during time on stream and it also enhances the catalyst's surface area, pore structure and attrition resistance in slurry-phase FTS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%