2019
DOI: 10.1177/0886109919857699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activism in Southwestern Queer and Trans Young Adults After the Marriage Equality Era

Abstract: In 2015, marriage equality in the United States was a big win for the gay and lesbian movement. Marriage equality as a primary focus of the movement, however, was not without its critiques, particularly as an issue affecting mostly white, gay, economically secure individuals. Given the history of the movement, it is essential to ask what is next. Young queer and trans people represent the next generation of potential activists and advocates for queer and trans liberation, yet little empirical attention has bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Views about legalized same-sex marriage are not homogenous among individuals who identify as bisexual (Galupo & Pearl, 2008), and warrant further investigation. Although we found no significant differences in subthemes by gender identity, other studies suggest that transgender and nonbinary individuals have unique perspectives about social and political goals that include, but extend beyond, marriage equality (Gandy-Guedes & Paceley, 2019; Shultz & Shultz, 2016). Furthermore, although White participants in the current study were more likely than participants of color to express concerns about unaddressed rights and safety, other research has documented significant concerns among SGM people of color about issues of social and economic justice that have not been addressed through legalization of same-sex marriage (DeFilippis, 2016; McGuffey, 2018; Moodie-Mills, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Views about legalized same-sex marriage are not homogenous among individuals who identify as bisexual (Galupo & Pearl, 2008), and warrant further investigation. Although we found no significant differences in subthemes by gender identity, other studies suggest that transgender and nonbinary individuals have unique perspectives about social and political goals that include, but extend beyond, marriage equality (Gandy-Guedes & Paceley, 2019; Shultz & Shultz, 2016). Furthermore, although White participants in the current study were more likely than participants of color to express concerns about unaddressed rights and safety, other research has documented significant concerns among SGM people of color about issues of social and economic justice that have not been addressed through legalization of same-sex marriage (DeFilippis, 2016; McGuffey, 2018; Moodie-Mills, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Intersectional perspectives of youth development also encourage the exploration of other social identities and experiences that shape mental health and wellbeing. For example, there has been growing attention to the experiences of rural and southern LGBTQ youth, and how their community contexts shape their experiences, but also their access to critical resources and strategies of resilience linked to social justice (Gandy-Guedes & Paceley, 2019;Paceley et al, 2020). There is also growing recognition of the experiences of disabled and neurodiverse/autistic LGBTQ people 2 (Kattari et al, 2017;Strang et al, 2020), LGBTQ youth living in situations of economic and housing instability (Choi et al, 2015;Frost et al, 2019), and LGBTQ youth who are or have been involved in systems of care and custody (e.g., foster care, juvenile punishment; Wilson et al, 2017;Wilson & Kastanis, 2015).…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Mental Health Among Lgbtq Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%