Activin B, which is strongly induced by inflammatory stimuli in the mouse liver, has recently appeared as a potent inductor of hepcidin in vitro, via the crossactivation of noncanonical SMAD1/5/8 signaling. 1,2 To confirm the cause and effect relationships among activin B, Smad1/ 5/8 phosphorylation, and hepcidin in vivo, we challenged Inhbb 2/2 mice 3 (deficient in activin B) with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or infected them with an Escherichia coli septicemic strain, as indicated in supplemental Methods (available on the Blood Web site).To examine whether, as observed in human hepatoma cell lines and in mouse primary hepatocytes, activin B also stimulates canonical SMAD2/3 and noncanonical SMAD1/5/8 signaling in vivo, we compared by western blot analysis Smad2 and Smad5 phosphorylation levels in the liver of wild-type and Inhbb 2/2 mice 4 hours after LPS stimulation ( Figure 1A) or E coli infection ( Figure 1B). Whereas these inflammatory stimuli strongly induce Smad2 and Smad5 phosphorylation in wild-type mice, none of these Smad effectors are activated in mice deficient in activin B. These data demonstrate that activin B, whose messenger RNA (mRNA) expression is strongly induced after LPS administration ( Figure 1C) or E coli infection ( Figure 1D), is required for activation of Smad1/5/8 signaling in these mice. In parallel to activating SMAD1/5/8 phosphorylation in vitro, activin B was also shown to induce hepcidin expression.1,2 Remarkably, pretreatment of hepatocytes with the BMP type I receptor inhibitor LDN-193189 prevented both the induction of SMAD/5/8 phosphorylation and the upregulation of the hepcidin (HAMP) gene expression by activin B, 1 suggesting that, at least in vitro, the effect of activin B on hepcidin expression was entirely attributable to the activation of noncanonical SMAD signaling. Since activin B also activates noncanonical Smad1/5/8 signaling in vivo, we expected that induction of hepcidin expression in response to LPS administration or E coli infection would be impaired in Inhbb 2/2 mice. However, the magnitude of hepcidin mRNA induction and its evolution over time was unexpectedly similar in wild-type and in Inhbb 2/2 mice challenged with LPS ( Figure 1E) or infected with E coli (Figure 1F), pointing out the limitations of in vitro studies. To confirm the data at the protein level, serum hepcidin was quantified by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in wild-type and in Inhbb 2/2 mice before and 4 hours after a LPS challenge. As suggested by the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data, and similarly to wild-type mice, Inhbb 2/2 mice produce on average 3 times more hepcidin after endotoxin administration ( Figure 1G). These results show that neither activation of Smad1/5/8 signaling nor activin B induction is necessary for upregulation of hepcidin production by inflammatory stimuli such as LPS administration or E coli infection.