2013
DOI: 10.1177/1077546313488792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active vibration control of rotor imbalance in active magnetic bearing systems

Abstract: Rotor imbalance causes undesirable synchronous vibrations of displacement, force and torque. An active vibration control (AVC) method achieving the minimum vibration force and torque within a desired vibration displacement is presented in an active magnetic bearing (AMB) system. First, the dynamics of the AMB system with static imbalance and dynamic imbalance are introduced, and the dimensional displacement relationships of the rotation, geometric and inertial axes of the rotor are described. Demands of the AV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MSFW with Vernier-gimballing ability is named as Vernier-gimballing MSFW, and the tested maximum torque introduced in this paper is up to 4.36Nm (Tang et al, 2017). As an actuator for the satellite attitude control in 3-DOFs, the principle of Vernier-gimballing MSFW to output torques is the same as that of the double flywheel or double gimbal variable speed control moment gyroscope (Fang et al, 2015; Peng et al, 2015), but the bandwidth of the Vernier-gimballing control of flywheel is 7.7Hz and is bigger than that of control moment gyroscope, which is generally 5Hz (Xu et al, 2015), so the Vernier-gimballing MSFW can respond to the command rapidly. Different from the control moment gyroscope, which needs gimbal driven by the motor to support high-speed rotor, the rotor in Vernier-gimballing MSFW controlled by MB can be tilted around each axis in the radial plane without any additional mechanical accessories, so the Vernier-gimballing MSFW has higher precision, less volume, less weight and less power consumption (Fang et al, 2010), and it is possible to decrease the number of the needed flywheels to control the attitude of spacecraft accordingly (Tang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSFW with Vernier-gimballing ability is named as Vernier-gimballing MSFW, and the tested maximum torque introduced in this paper is up to 4.36Nm (Tang et al, 2017). As an actuator for the satellite attitude control in 3-DOFs, the principle of Vernier-gimballing MSFW to output torques is the same as that of the double flywheel or double gimbal variable speed control moment gyroscope (Fang et al, 2015; Peng et al, 2015), but the bandwidth of the Vernier-gimballing control of flywheel is 7.7Hz and is bigger than that of control moment gyroscope, which is generally 5Hz (Xu et al, 2015), so the Vernier-gimballing MSFW can respond to the command rapidly. Different from the control moment gyroscope, which needs gimbal driven by the motor to support high-speed rotor, the rotor in Vernier-gimballing MSFW controlled by MB can be tilted around each axis in the radial plane without any additional mechanical accessories, so the Vernier-gimballing MSFW has higher precision, less volume, less weight and less power consumption (Fang et al, 2010), and it is possible to decrease the number of the needed flywheels to control the attitude of spacecraft accordingly (Tang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a maglev flywheel system, an unbalanced interference signal synchronous with the flywheel frequency would be produced because the flywheel rotor is uneven, which will give rise to unbalanced vibration response and affect the stored energy of the flywheel battery and restrict its application in electric vehicles and other areas . So, the signal should be filtered out to reduce the effects on the control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, precise control current should be generated to compensate the vibration caused by the displacement stiffness [ 20 ]. However, the precision of this approach mainly depends on the parameter accuracy of the controlled object [ 21 ], especially the voltage-source power amplifiers, whose performances vary greatly with many parameters, such as temperature and the inductance of the AMB coil [ 22 ]. The precision of rotation around the inertial axis will inevitably decrease due to the inaccurate control current caused by the errors and variations of the power amplifiers [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%