1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02945726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active vibration control of flexible cantilever beam using piezo actuator and Filtered-X LMS algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…State space models are especially convenient for the multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) control design problems. In [14] a single-input single-output model was considered.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…State space models are especially convenient for the multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) control design problems. In [14] a single-input single-output model was considered.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] active vibration control of a flexible cantilever beam was studied using the Filtered-X LMS algorithm, applied to design a control law for a piezoelectric actuator. In comparison with this algorithm, the technique with the optimal LQ controller and Kalman estimator proposed and applied in the present paper results in considerably faster controlled response in the time domain, and in higher vibration magnitude suppression in the frequency domain.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is truncated in the second mode, because in experimental studies [8,9,16,17] where system identification for cantilevered beams was performed, just the first two modes of vibration have considerable amplitude. The mode shape functions are assumed to have the form 1 1 ,…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical approach used in AVC applications is adaptive fi ltering methods based on the Filtered-x Least Mean Square (FxLMS) algorithm (Kuo et al 1996, Oh et al 1998and Shouwe et al 2010. This approach was used by Oh et al (1998) and Shouwe et al (2010) to attenuate the effect of one harmonic disturbance acting on a fl exible beam. The FxLMS approach often works well in practice but might suffer from disadvantages like slow convergence and poor tracking performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%