2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active versus passive restoration: Recovery of cloud forest structure, diversity and soil condition in abandoned pastures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Cattle pasture (degraded ecosystem; P): 80 ha of active pasture (~1 head/ha), which was cloud forest prior to transformation about 40 [13]. Canopy is closed with average height of 24.5 m (± 1.1).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. Cattle pasture (degraded ecosystem; P): 80 ha of active pasture (~1 head/ha), which was cloud forest prior to transformation about 40 [13]. Canopy is closed with average height of 24.5 m (± 1.1).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, with active restoration, 44% of the basal area present in the cloud forest was recovered, while with passive restoration only 26% was recovered. In addition, in the forest with passive restoration, there are canopy gaps with 12 times more cover of the invasive fern Pteridium arachnoideum, compared to the forest with active restoration [13]. P. arachnoideum creates a dense layer of vegetation on the ground and prevents the establishment of cloud forest tree species [59].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their conclusions are based primarily on ecological metrics of abundance and species richness, and forest structure that take far less time to achieve restoration success than dissimilarity on specific composition, particularly for canopy trees due to their slow turnover time [12,13,85,86]. Otherwise, most of the research that considered community composition encourage active restoration in order to assist more complete and faster recovery of old-growth biodiversity [87,88], highlighting that differences are long lasting. But even highly disturbed forests could, with appropriate management, provide important opportunities for better conserving and using tropical forest [89].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for this slow recovery are the high limitation of seed dispersal (Wijdeven and Kuzee 2000; Cubiña and Aide 2001), intense competition with pioneer species in particular annual grasses (Ortega-Pieck et al 2011), adverse microclimatic conditions prevailing in open areas due to excessive solar radiation and extreme temperatures and poor soil conditions due low soil fertility, soil compaction and erosion. These conditions are not favorable for the germination and establishment of incoming seeds(Bassett et al 2005;Trujillo-Miranda et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%