The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: Need for intervention and survival at 10 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
11
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our AS failure rate is 38.5% is slightly higher compared to other cohorts as reported by Klotz et al [11], PRIAS [9], Tosoian et al [10], Preston et al [12], Dall’Era et al [13], (22.6, 28, 30.6, 34.7, 38%). These variations in failure rates may result from different criteria or the population utilized for the study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Our AS failure rate is 38.5% is slightly higher compared to other cohorts as reported by Klotz et al [11], PRIAS [9], Tosoian et al [10], Preston et al [12], Dall’Era et al [13], (22.6, 28, 30.6, 34.7, 38%). These variations in failure rates may result from different criteria or the population utilized for the study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Hence, active surveillance has emerged as an alternative treatment option for men with early-stage disease, without compromising overall and cancer-specific survival. In contemporary cohorts of patients managed with such strategy, freedom from treatment was reported to be around 80% at 5 years and 60% at 10 years (5). Common reasons for change in patient management are upgrading of the histological grade (Gleason score) and volume progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature verifying that AS is a reasonable and safe management strategy for selected PCa patients. In a recent report on a series of 469 men being managed by AS between 1997 and 2009, the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 100% [50]. However, about a quarter of this cohort dropped out of the AS-protocol, most commonly due to pathologic progression on re-biopsy, PSA-progression, and patient preference, and the estimated probability of undergoing treatment within 10 years after the start of AS was reported to be 38% [50].…”
Section: Dw-mri As a Support For Management Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent report on a series of 469 men being managed by AS between 1997 and 2009, the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 100% [50]. However, about a quarter of this cohort dropped out of the AS-protocol, most commonly due to pathologic progression on re-biopsy, PSA-progression, and patient preference, and the estimated probability of undergoing treatment within 10 years after the start of AS was reported to be 38% [50]. Given this considerable drop-out rate, there is the need for more reliable risk-assessment tools that can substantiate the decision of AS eligibility.…”
Section: Dw-mri As a Support For Management Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%