2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active suppression of structural chatter vibrations using machine drives and accelerometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It belongs to the wider group of vibration reduction methods that utilize spindle speed variation [10,11], or matching the spindle speed to the selected properties of the machining process and the workpiece [12][13][14]. The advantage of these methods is that they generally need neither modifications of the machine tool structure nor utilization of sophisticated equipment, like for example: active damping methods [15][16][17][18][19], semiactive methods [20,21] or dynamic feedforward control applied towards heavy machine tools [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It belongs to the wider group of vibration reduction methods that utilize spindle speed variation [10,11], or matching the spindle speed to the selected properties of the machining process and the workpiece [12][13][14]. The advantage of these methods is that they generally need neither modifications of the machine tool structure nor utilization of sophisticated equipment, like for example: active damping methods [15][16][17][18][19], semiactive methods [20,21] or dynamic feedforward control applied towards heavy machine tools [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the dynamics of the machine tool can be improved by passive and active damping systems, as summarized by Munoa et al [16]. Among the different reviewed techniques, Munoa et al [17] used an additional acceleration feedback control loop to damp chatter vibrations while using a double pinion and rack feed drive. Later, Beudaert et al [18] described the limiting factors of this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganguli et al [2] investigated the effect of active damping on regenerative chatter instability. Munoa et al [3] used the machine tool's own drives to suppress chatter with the help of an external accelerometer located close to the tool center point. Duncan et al [4] increased the damping of the spindle-cutter system near the chatter frequency by adding additional dampers to the spindle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%