2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active sites without restraints: high-resolution analysis of metal cofactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the relatively small X‐ray absorption cross‐section, one usually needs relatively high concentrations to obtain detectable signals, of the order of a few millimolar. Moreover, the intense incident X‐ray beam often causes sample changes and/or degradation, e.g., photoreduction or lysis,, which can be avoided by limiting the time the sample is exposed to the beam and repeating the individual scans several times at fresh sample spots. Sensitive biological samples often survive only tens of seconds of exposure at typical modern synchrotron beams before spectral changes are observed, even at 10 K or lower ,.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the relatively small X‐ray absorption cross‐section, one usually needs relatively high concentrations to obtain detectable signals, of the order of a few millimolar. Moreover, the intense incident X‐ray beam often causes sample changes and/or degradation, e.g., photoreduction or lysis,, which can be avoided by limiting the time the sample is exposed to the beam and repeating the individual scans several times at fresh sample spots. Sensitive biological samples often survive only tens of seconds of exposure at typical modern synchrotron beams before spectral changes are observed, even at 10 K or lower ,.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The W-O distance of 2.04 Å observed in the X-ray structure at 1.26 Å resolution was between the values expected for an hydroxo ligand (OH − , 1.9-2.1 Å) and a coordinated water molecule (H 2 O, 2.0-2.3 Å). The authors chose H 2 O, since the close proximity of the heavy scatterer W may distort the distance observed in the X-ray data by Fourier series termination and a simulation of this effect resulted in a true ligand distance of 2.25 Å [63,70].…”
Section: Active Site Cavity Of Ah and Site-directed Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems concerning high quality crystal structures of metal-and cofactor-containing proteins, particularly when light ligands are bound to or are in close proximity of heavy atoms, have been recently pointed out by Einsle and colleagues [70]. A coordinated H 2 O could gain a partially positive net charge by the proximity of the protonated Asp-13, turning it into an electrophile that would directly attack the C≡C triple bond.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Ahmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original 2.2 Å resolution structure of nitrogenase detailed an FeMoco with a geometrically complex arrangement of six inner iron atoms and nine surface sulfur atoms . This arrangement of identical scatterers resulted in additive ripple effects from each atom, effectively concealing the central light atom and leading to the initial incorrect interpretation of an empty pocket . In a later 1.16 Å resolution structure, a light atom at the center of the FeMoco was observed but unable to be unambiguously assigned .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%