2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active site gate of M32 carboxypeptidases illuminated by crystal structure and molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most M32 proteins are oligopeptidases and the length of their substrate is governed by the length of the active site groove, which closes upon substrate binding ( Sharma et al, 2017 ). The Arg (Arg92 in PfuCP), located at the back of the substrate groove, is 100% conserved in over 600 sequences of M32CPs ( Lee et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Structure Of Keratinolytic Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most M32 proteins are oligopeptidases and the length of their substrate is governed by the length of the active site groove, which closes upon substrate binding ( Sharma et al, 2017 ). The Arg (Arg92 in PfuCP), located at the back of the substrate groove, is 100% conserved in over 600 sequences of M32CPs ( Lee et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Structure Of Keratinolytic Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermus aquaticus (TaqCP), Pyrococcus furiosus (PfuCP), Leishmania major (LmaCP)). Hence, M32 subfamily I should be able to cleave only those substrates that are small enough to fit into the narrow substrate groove and allow the active site gate to be closed ( Sharma et al, 2017 ). Furthermore, TaqCP, PfuCP and LmaCP in subfamily I have broad substrate specificity with a C-terminal amino acid preference in the order basic > aliphatic > aromatic >> acidic and the substrate is limited to 7–15 residues ( Lee et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Structure Of Keratinolytic Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a presumptive explanation can be put forward. As in the case of many other metallopeptidase inhibitors, it is likely that inhibition of trypanosomatid M32 MCPs occurs throughout the perturbation of the coordination sphere of the catalytic metal ion (presumably Zn 2+ in the case of Tc MCP-1 and Tb MCP-1, by extension from other M32 enzymes [31]). Typically, synthetic metallopeptidase inhibitors achieve preliminary affinity and target selectivity through the formation of stabilizing interactions with specific residues within the active site; while a ZBG is responsible for metal chelation, enhancing binding affinity, modulating selectivity and disrupting catalytic activity [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the most potent inhibitor described so far for an enzyme of the M32 family and seems a promising candidate for further structure-based optimization. The unusually high flexibility of the M32 MCPs around the active site [31, 34] prevented us to use a docking approach to get insights of the binding mode of this compound within Tc MCP-1 and Tb MCP-1 catalytic clefts. However, the TCMDC-143620 molecule seems able to form a variety of stabilizing interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular Modeling has been widely used to decode the nature of the dynamical events involved in structure-function relationship of naturally-occurring biological macromolecules. From short to large scale motions, theoretical (e.g., Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations and Normal Modes Analysis) studies constantly provide evidence on how the dynamics of the protein host is influenced by the presence or absence of substrates and/or inhibitors as well as the tight relationship between these changes and the accessibility to catalytically efficient configurations (Dutta and Mishra, 2017; Sen et al, 2017; Sharma et al, 2017; Wilson and Wetmore, 2017; Wilson et al, 2017; Kamariah et al, 2018; Luirink et al, 2018; Rout et al, 2018; Schlee et al, 2018). It is therefore a legitimate question to use computation to assess to what extent bridging chemical and biological entities disturb the natural conformational space of the biomolecules and how damaging/beneficial this can be for catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%