2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4929-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active-site and interface engineering of cathode materials for aqueous Zn—gas batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gibbs free energy and structural configuration of electrochemical CO 2 reduction into CO were given in Figure 6b and Figure S8, respectively. For all the models, the formation of *COOH is the rate‐determining step, which is consistent with the previous reports [30,33,34] . We first compared the C and N (Figure S9) sites in NC for CO 2 R, and confirmed that the C atom adjacent to graphitic N are active sites in NC, with the free energy barrier for *COOH formation of 2.01 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gibbs free energy and structural configuration of electrochemical CO 2 reduction into CO were given in Figure 6b and Figure S8, respectively. For all the models, the formation of *COOH is the rate‐determining step, which is consistent with the previous reports [30,33,34] . We first compared the C and N (Figure S9) sites in NC for CO 2 R, and confirmed that the C atom adjacent to graphitic N are active sites in NC, with the free energy barrier for *COOH formation of 2.01 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For all the models, the formation of *COOH is the rate-determining step, which is consistent with the previous reports. [30,33,34] We first compared the C and N (Figure S9) sites in NC for CO 2 R, and confirmed that the C atom adjacent to graphitic N are active sites in NC, with the free energy barrier for *COOH formation of 2.01 eV. The results also accord with the reports of Zhang et al [24] Compared with NC, NC@Ag and Ag@NC both show lower free energy barriers for CO 2 R (1.33 eV for NC@Ag and 0.48 eV for Ag@NC).…”
Section: Chemelectrochemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the anode chamber, HMF oxidation occurred; while for the cathode chamber, hydrogen product was generated. 37,38 Fig. 4e shows the LSV curves taken at 5 mV s À1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the co-existence of Cu + and Vo synergistically contributes stronger affinities to *CO and *COH, which can optimize the C2H4 pathway 4 . Therefore, this inspires us to seek a catalyst with abundant Cu + and Vo species by employing the atomic regulation strategy [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] , which is considered to be active for C2H4 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%