2004 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2004. IEEE ICIT '04.
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2004.1490821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active shape model based segmentation of bone structures in hip radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two specific learning-based algorithms, Active Shape Model (ASM) and Active Appearance Model (AAM), have proven successful in segmenting CT, MRI, and x-ray images [5,11,2]. Boukala [4] successfully applied the ASM algorithm to pelvic x-rays; however, individual structures were not segmented, and the focus was on pathological deformities in hip replacement patients, rather than pelvic fractures sustained in traumatic injury. …”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two specific learning-based algorithms, Active Shape Model (ASM) and Active Appearance Model (AAM), have proven successful in segmenting CT, MRI, and x-ray images [5,11,2]. Boukala [4] successfully applied the ASM algorithm to pelvic x-rays; however, individual structures were not segmented, and the focus was on pathological deformities in hip replacement patients, rather than pelvic fractures sustained in traumatic injury. …”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean contour errors from up to 12 mm [10] down to about 1.5 mm [7], [12] have been reported. Current approaches based on Active Shape Models (ASM) rely on a single image feature for delineation.…”
Section: A Active Shape Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various segmentation techniques to solve this task have been proposed, including template-based registration [6], level-set segmentation [7], geometric approaches [8], Active Contours [9] and Active Shape Models [10], [11], [12]. Mean contour errors from up to 12 mm [10] down to about 1.5 mm [7], [12] have been reported.…”
Section: A Active Shape Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Detecting cancerous bone [8] • Calculating cortical bone mineralization using segmentation of osteons and interstitial tissue [9] • Relating osteon geometry to age, sex, height, and weight [10] • Relating bone mineralization changes to age and sex [11] • Segmenting bone structures in anterior-posterior radiographs on the basis of active shape models [12] • Measuring cartilage tissue using shape-based segmentation for bones [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%