2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active-screen plasma surface multi-functionalisation of biopolymers and carbon-based materials – An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the plasma is formed on the active screen and the samples (GF separators) are at a floating potential, which can avoid the arcing problem on non‐conductive materials in conventional treatments. [ 20 ] To deposit the oxygen‐deficient SiO x , the Si vapor was produced in H 2 plasma with oxygen from residual air by ion bombardment on a Si wafer that was attached to the top of active screen. The digital photo shows that GF can be fully exposed to the active species in the glow (Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the plasma is formed on the active screen and the samples (GF separators) are at a floating potential, which can avoid the arcing problem on non‐conductive materials in conventional treatments. [ 20 ] To deposit the oxygen‐deficient SiO x , the Si vapor was produced in H 2 plasma with oxygen from residual air by ion bombardment on a Si wafer that was attached to the top of active screen. The digital photo shows that GF can be fully exposed to the active species in the glow (Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the ester bonds from the PAN polymer are integrated into the PVAG layer. This interaction modi es the vibration of the ester bonds, subsequently causing a discernible alteration in either the peak intensity or position observed within the ATR-FTIR spectrum [39][40][41] .…”
Section: Surface Chemistry Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that plasma treatments are some of the most promising surface modification methods [ 9 , 10 ]. These techniques are capable of altering the physical and chemical properties of a material surface, thereby significantly enhancing the surface wettability and adhesion properties without influencing the bulk properties of the material [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Among the plasma treatments currently available, μPlasma surface modification is particularly interesting because, unlike traditional plasma treatments that require low-pressure conditions (typically 50–400 Pa) [ 15 ], μPlasma modifications can be performed under atmospheric conditions, thus significantly reducing the processing costs [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%