2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01595-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Perception Fruit Harvesting Robots — A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33], the focus is on recent non-destructive analysis techniques (2022), exploring methods such as nuclear magnetic imaging, X-ray imaging, acoustic methods, etc., similar to [29]. In [34], the most commonly used methods by fruit-picking robots are analyzed, highlighting that these robots typically perform detection/segmentation tasks using classical machine learning and deep learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], the focus is on recent non-destructive analysis techniques (2022), exploring methods such as nuclear magnetic imaging, X-ray imaging, acoustic methods, etc., similar to [29]. In [34], the most commonly used methods by fruit-picking robots are analyzed, highlighting that these robots typically perform detection/segmentation tasks using classical machine learning and deep learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion of multiple models [24,25,26], each specializing in a particular aspect of fruit classification and grading, is yet another method. Combining a CNN-based model for fruit classification with a regression-based model for grading, for instance, can result in enhanced performance levels [27,28].…”
Section: Review Of Existing Models Used For Multivariate Classificati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stateoftheart progress in research and future challenges is docu mented in a wide range of review papers and book chapters addressing agriculture in general [1], [3], [4], [5] and specific application domains, including phenotyping [6], [7], [8] ara ble farming [9], livestock farming [10], greenhouse horticulture [2], orchard management [11], forestry [12], and food processing [13]. Review papers also address specific technologies in the context of agricultural robotics, such as computer vision [14], [15], active perception [16], unmanned aer ial vehicle technologies [17], [18], cov erage path planning in arable farming [19], and grasping and soft grasping [20], [21]. Some illustrative examples of agrifood robotics are documented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%