2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7962961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active noise control and secondary path modeling algorithms for earphones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constitution of three ANC headphone models for the experiment is illustrated in Figure 1 . In addition, KEMAR (GRAS Sound & Vibration, Denmark) [ 28 ] manikins were used to record the audio from the three ANC headphone models. The pure tones used in this study were tested at the four frequencies (0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz) required for audiometric screening, and both steady (pink noise) and non-steady (cafeteria babble noise) noises [ 29 ] were selected as the background noise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitution of three ANC headphone models for the experiment is illustrated in Figure 1 . In addition, KEMAR (GRAS Sound & Vibration, Denmark) [ 28 ] manikins were used to record the audio from the three ANC headphone models. The pure tones used in this study were tested at the four frequencies (0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz) required for audiometric screening, and both steady (pink noise) and non-steady (cafeteria babble noise) noises [ 29 ] were selected as the background noise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study design of a high proportion of the control groups only stated the SC and did not clarify the actual intervention device. As there were differences in the comfort and functions of noise-canceling earphones, headphones, or earphones [74,75], the study results tended to be affected by the differences in intervention devices. However, a clear description of the intervention measures was lacking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%