2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active methane venting observed at giant pockmarks along the U.S. mid-Atlantic shelf break

Abstract: (concentrations above open ocean background), combined with water column salinity and 2 temperature vertical profiles, indicate that methane-rich water is not present across the entire width of the pockmarks, but is laterally restricted to their edges. We suggest that venting is primarily along the top of the pockmark walls with some advection and dispersion due to local currents. The highest methane concentrations observed with the METS sensor occur at a small, circular pockmark at the southern end of the stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern seep activity can be detected through seabed observations, pore water analysis, methane anomaly detection, and many other methods (Borowski et al, 1996(Borowski et al, , 1999Borowski, 2004;Newman et al, 2008;Bayon et al, 2009bBayon et al, , 2011Mazumdar et al, 2012aMazumdar et al, , 2014Brothers et al, 2013Brothers et al, , 2014Lemaitre et al, 2014;Skarke et al, 2014), but temporal variations in methane flux in the past are not well constrained because it is difficult to select the appropriate indicators in quantifying and age determining the occurrence of seep activity. Consequently, little is known about the impact of methane seepage on the surrounding sediment environment in seep settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern seep activity can be detected through seabed observations, pore water analysis, methane anomaly detection, and many other methods (Borowski et al, 1996(Borowski et al, , 1999Borowski, 2004;Newman et al, 2008;Bayon et al, 2009bBayon et al, , 2011Mazumdar et al, 2012aMazumdar et al, , 2014Brothers et al, 2013Brothers et al, , 2014Lemaitre et al, 2014;Skarke et al, 2014), but temporal variations in methane flux in the past are not well constrained because it is difficult to select the appropriate indicators in quantifying and age determining the occurrence of seep activity. Consequently, little is known about the impact of methane seepage on the surrounding sediment environment in seep settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any seep may be composed of a single gas stream or several ones very close to each other such that they clearly define its perimeter. Submarine seeps, at cold seeps, occur worldwide along the continental margins and are usually related to geological structures with either positive reliefs such as submarine pingoes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], carbonate concretions and pavements [8][9][10][11], and mud volcanoes [9,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or negative reliefs like pockmarks [13,[19][20][21][22][23]. They also occur in seafloor-reaching fault areas at tectonically active regions without being associated with a specific relief [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La filtración de gas de los sedimentos suele ser muy localizada y sería difícil de detectar mediante el muestreo de estaciones fijas en la columna de agua. Sondeos ultrasónicos (e.g., Canet et al 2010) y/o el uso de vehículos submarinos autónomos o remolcados con sensores de metano CTD y METS (e.g., Merewether et al 1985, Newman et al 2008) serían medios más eficaces para detectar el metano y las plumas hidrotermales en una región amplia como el norte del GC, y serían útiles para ubicar las filtraciones individuales, incluyendo la filtración inferida en el umbral de CB.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…Gas seepage from the sediments is likely to be highly localized and would be difficult to detect by fixed station water column sampling. Underway echo sounding (e.g., Canet et al 2010) and/or deploying a towed or autonomous underwater vehicle with CTD and METS methane sensors (e.g., Merewether et al 1985, Newman et al 2008 would be a more efficient means of detecting methane and hydrothermal plumes over a wide area, such as the NGC, and would be helpful in pinpointing the locations of individual seeps, including the inferred seep near the BC sill. que han perforado el fondo marino muy cerca de nuestras estaciones 5 y 7 (Persaud et al 2003).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesmentioning
confidence: 99%