2015 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/devlrn.2015.7346145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active learning of local predictable representations with artificial curiosity

Abstract: In this article, we present some preliminary work on integrating an artificial curiosity mechanism in PROPRE, a generic and modular neural architecture, to obtain online, openended and active learning of a sensory-motor space, where large areas can be unlearnable. PROPRE consists of the combination of the projection of the input motor flow, using a self-organizing map, with the regression of the sensory output flow from this projection representation, using a linear regression. The main feature of PROPRE is th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, curiosity could be underpinned by a drive to maximize learning progress by interacting with the environment in a novel manner relative to previously encountered events (Oudeyer et al., ). Alternatively, curiosity could be driven by prediction mechanisms, allowing the system to engage in activities for which predictability is maximal (Lefort & Gepperth, ) or minimal (Botvinick, Niv, & Barto, ). Still other approaches assume that curiosity involves maximizing a system's competence or ability to perform a task (Murakami, Kroger, Birkholz, & Triesch, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, curiosity could be underpinned by a drive to maximize learning progress by interacting with the environment in a novel manner relative to previously encountered events (Oudeyer et al., ). Alternatively, curiosity could be driven by prediction mechanisms, allowing the system to engage in activities for which predictability is maximal (Lefort & Gepperth, ) or minimal (Botvinick, Niv, & Barto, ). Still other approaches assume that curiosity involves maximizing a system's competence or ability to perform a task (Murakami, Kroger, Birkholz, & Triesch, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, to address the proposed fusion problem. It is conceptually similar to several of our previous works in multi-sensory fusion [17], incremental learning [18][19][20] and developmental learning [21,22]. In the light of the evaluation criteria for multi-sensory fusion approaches proposed in Sec.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Over the years, different types of curiosity mechanism have been proposed for artificial systems. Some researchers suggest that curiosity could be prediction-based, causing agents to attend to input for which predictability is minimal 192 or maximal 193 . In the context of curriculum learning, ref.…”
Section: Box 3 | Lesson 3 From Infant Learning: Learning Through Curr...mentioning
confidence: 99%